Practical intelligence and leadership styles in military leaders: a study of team dynamics

Koltunov E.; Glukhov P.

doi:10.14529/pps250303

E. I. Koltunov South-Ural State University (76 ave. Lenin, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia) http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4836-7859 koltunovei@susu.ru
P. S. Glukhov South Ural State University (76 ave. Lenin, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia) http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5746-7928 glukhovps@susu.ru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/pps250303

Keywords: practical intelligence of military leaders, MLQ Form 5X Short, intelligence, practical intelligence, tacit knowledge, leadership style

Abstract

Introduction. In an era of rapid change, effective leadership demands both effectiveness and the ability to understand surrounding challenges. Military commanders must routinely make decisions under uncertainty, relying not only on specialized skills but also on their baseline knowledge beyond predefined conditions. This study examines the relationship between leadership styles and practical intelligence among military leaders in team settings. Materials and Methods. The study employed two psychometric measures: the Practical Intelligence of the Commander in Non-Standard Situations (PIC-NS), adapted by the authors, and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ Form 5X Short; B. Bass, B. Avolio). Participants included 85 military students (aged 20–22) from a military training center. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Results. Participants were stratified into high- and low-practical-intelligence groups based on PIC-NS scores. Factor analysis revealed the structure of leadership styles within these groups: in participants with low levels of practical intelligence, leadership strategies clustered into a single factor, with a pronounced dichotomy between transactional strategies (negative reinforcement-based) and idealized influence, alongside self-reported leadership satisfaction. In participants with high levels of practical intelligence, greater diversification of leadership styles was observed, with effective strategies and their outcomes contrasting with laissez-faire approaches. Conclusion. Findings underscore the role of practical intelligence in shaping the structure of leadership styles. Practical applications include optimizing decision-making processes for leaders with varying levels of practical intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

E. I. Koltunov , South-Ural State University (76 ave. Lenin, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia)

Researcher, Laboratory of Psychology and Psychophysiology of Stress Resistance and Creativity, Department of Psychology of Management and Performance

P. S. Glukhov , South Ural State University (76 ave. Lenin, Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia)

Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Psychology and Psychophysiology of Stress Resistance and Creativity, Department of Psychology of Management and Performance

References

1. Antonakis J., House R., Simonton D.K. Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2017;102:1003–1021. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000221.
2. Zaccaro S.J., Green J.P., Dubrow S., Kolze M. Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. Leadership Quarterly. 2018;29(1):2–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003.
3. Coronado-Maldonado I., Benítez-Márquez M.D. Emotional intelligence, leadership, and work teams: A hybrid literature review. Heliyon. 2023;9(10):e20356. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20356.
4. Rüth R., Netzer T. The key elements of cultural intelligence as a driver for digital leadership success. Leadership Education and Personality Interdisciplinary Journal. 2020;2:3–8. DOI: 10.1365/s42681-019-00005-x.
5. Lee C.C., Li Y.S., Yeh W.C., Yu Z. The effects of leader emotional intelligence, leadership styles, organizational commitment, and trust on job performance in the real estate brokerage industry. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:881725. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.881725.
6. Sternberg R.J. The Intelligent Attitude: What Is Missing from Intelligence Tests. Journal of Intelligence. 2022;10(4):116. DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence10040116.
7. Bekesiene S., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene I., Hošková-Mayerová Š. Military leader behavior formation for sustainable country security. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4521. DOI: 10.3390/su13084521.
8. Aguilar S. A review of the linkages between emotional intelligence and leadership in the military forces. Business Ethics and Leadership. 2019;3(2):29–38. DOI: 10.21272/bel.3(2).29-38.2019.
9. Ion C., Cioranu I. Emotional intelligence in military leadership. Romanian Military Thinking. 2021;152–167. DOI: 10.55535/RMT.2021.1.10.
10. Koh C.B., OHiggins E. Relationships between emotional intelligence, perceived and actual leadership effectiveness in the military context. Military Psychology. 2018;30(1):27–42. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2017.1419021.
11. Krishnakumar S., Perera B., Persich Durham M., Robinson M. Affective and effective: Military job performance as a function of work-related emotional intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2019;27. DOI: 10.1111/ijsa.12239.
12. Valor-Segura I., Navarro-Carrillo G., Extremera N. et al. Predicting job satisfaction in military organizations: Unpacking the relationship between emotional intelligence, teamwork communication, and job attitudes in Spanish military cadets. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:875. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00875.
13. Kark R., Karazi-Presler T., Tubi S. Paradox and challenges in military leadership. Emerald Insight. 2016. DOI: 10.1108/S1479-357120160000008031.
14. González Marín A., Peña Pan L., Arboleda Guirao I. de J. Emotional intelligence and work performance in the Air Force: an empirical study. Revista de Pensamiento Estratégico y Seguridad CISDE. 2019;4(1):67–89.
15. Hedlund J., Forsythe G.B., Horvath J.A. et al. Identifying and assessing tacit knowledge: Understanding the practical intelligence of military leaders. The Leadership Quarterly. 2003;14(2):117–140. DOI: 10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00006-7.
16. Taylor T.Z., Psotka J., Legree P. Relationships among applications of tacit knowledge and transformational/transactional leader styles. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 2015;36(2):120–136.
17. Brooks Babin L., Garven A.J. Tacit knowledge cultivation as an essential component of developing experts: A literature review. Journal of Military Learning. 2019;3(1):3–18.
18. Antonakis J., Hedlund J., Pretz J. Exploring the nature and acquisition of tacit knowledge for military leadership. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. 2002. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235179819_Exploring_ the_Nature_and_Acquisition_ of_Tacit_Knowledge_for_Military_Leadership.
19. Ujoatuonu I., Oguzie U., Kanu G. et al. Unlocking the psychology of work and insecurity: How tacit knowledge sharing, diversity climate, and thriving at work influence perceived work ability of military personnel. Psychology and Psychological Research International Journal. 2023;8:000324.
20. Nagendra A., Morappakkam S. Knowledge management enablers and barriers in the army: An interpretive structural modeling approach. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016;9(45):1–12.
21. Singh M.K., Gupta V. Critical types of knowledge loss in military organizations. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. 2021;51(4):618–635.
22. Koltunov E., Glukhov P. Adaptation of the tacit knowledge for military leaders questionnaire. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophisiology. 2024;17(1):20–25]. DOI: 10.14529/jpps240102
23. Avolio B.J., Bass B.M. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Mind Garden, Redwood City, CA. 2004:126.
24. Kayaalp A. Transformational leadership, organizational climate and individual creativity from a military culture perspective. Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science. 2018;4(9):91–110.
25. Nazri M., Rudi M. Military leadership: A systematic literature review of current research. International Journal of Business and Management. 2019;3(2):1–15.
26. Fosse T.H., Skogstad A., Einarsen S.V. et al. Active and passive forms of destructive leadership in a military context: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2019;28(5):708–722.

References on translit

-