Impact of digital technologies on human cognitive abilities (a review)

  • Y. P. Ignatova Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver,170100, Russia) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3546-8861 physilogtgma@mail.ru
  • I. I. Makarova Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver, 170100, Russia) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-3389 iim777@yandex.ru
  • V. P. Stepanenko Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver, 170100, Russian Federation) lerastepanenko2001@mail.ru
  • A. A. Bagdasarov Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver, 170100, Russian Federation) abagdasarov@internet.ru
Keywords: digital technologies, smartphones, Internet, cognitive abilities

Abstract

Background. To date, digital technologies have penetrated almost every sphere of human life and are an integral part of the development of society. This situation determines the interest of the scientific community in the impact of digital technologies on human health, in particular on its cognitive functions.
Aim: to analyze the impact of digital technologies on human cognitive functions based on the results of scientific studies published mainly in the last five years, as well as structure and organize knowledge.
Methods and materials: a systematic analysis of the published results of original studies posted on the PubMed and eLIBRARY.ru websites. Results. A brief review of the original research did not give a clear answer about the positive or negative impact of digital technologies. Many works show the development of such cognitive skills as attention, memory, and information processing speed. However, positive results, especially in children, are limited by the time of use of digital media. The effectiveness of the use of digital technologies was noted in the aspect of brain training for the prevention of age-related changes in cognitive functions. As negative points, it is noted that active users of digital technologies are characterized by a figurative perception of the material inherent in clip thinking, making it difficult to highlight the meaning and understand the analogies between abstract concepts. Conclusion. The main problem is the unlimited use of information resources and the low quality of the information consumed. The pace of development of modern society, which excludes a complete rejection of digital technologies, and the inconsistency of the data obtained indicate the need to continue research. Further research will make it possible to find out how to avoid the negative impact of digital technologies on human cognitive functions and promote the development of the latter by competently using the gifts of civilization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Y. P. Ignatova , Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver,170100, Russia)

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Physiology

I. I. Makarova , Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver, 170100, Russia)

Doctor of Medical Sciences, ProfessorHead of Department of Physiology

V. P. Stepanenko , Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver, 170100, Russian Federation)

Student, pediatric faculty

A. A. Bagdasarov , Tver State Medical University (4, st. Sovetskaya, Tver, 170100, Russian Federation)

Student, pediatric faculty

References

1. Hutton J.S., Dudley J., Horowitz-Kraus T. et al. Associations between screen-based media use and brain white matter integrity in preschool-aged children. JAMA Pediatrics. 2020;174(1):e193869. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3869
2. Batenova Yu.V. Intensification of the digital experience of preschool children: cognitive consequences. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. 2019;4:4–20. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2019.04.04
3. Vodyakha S.A., Vodyakha Yu.E., Minyurova S.A. Features of the intelligence structure of primary schoolchildren trained by means of gadgets. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2019;7:133–140. (in Russ.). DOI:http://doi.org/10.26170/po19-07-18
4. Dogurevich O.A., Sugrobova G.A. The impact of working on pc with different types of information on the psychophysiological state of adolescents. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Povolzhskii region. Estestvennye nauki = University proceedings. Volga region. Natural sciences. 2017;4(20):65–73. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.21685/2307-9150-2017-4-5
5. Gut Ju.N., Kabardov M.K., Kosheleva Ju.P., Moskvitina O.A. Cognitive functions and personal characteristics of schoolchildren in different educational environments. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya = Perspectives of science and education. 2021;5(53):323–333. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.5.22
6. Lugovaya V.F., Piskunova E.V., Proekt Yu.L. Analysis of the characteristics of memory as part of cognitive sphere of senior pupils in the context of their subjective depending on digital technologies. Pisma v Emissiya. Offlain = The Emissia. Offline Letters. 2020;10:2876. (access: 12.07.2022) (in Russ.).
7. Bogomolova E.S., Languev K.A., Kotova N.V., Langueva E.V. The influence of the digital environment on the mental capacity and thinking of students. Nauka i shkola = Science and School. 2022;1:123–133. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2022-1-123-133
8. Mikova T.E. Possibilities and consequences of using smartphones in learning activities. Sovremennaya vysshaya shkola: innovatsionnyi aspekt = Contemporary Higher Education: Innovative Aspects. 2019;3(45):53–61. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.7442/2071-9620-2019-11-3-53-61
9. Mangen A., Olivier G., Velay J.L. Comparing Comprehension of a Long Text Read in Print Book and on Kindle: Where in the Text and When in the Story? Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:38. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038
10. Rabadanova A.I. The definition of the severity of cognitive functions in individuals with different levels of information load. Vestnik psikhofiziologii = Psychophysiology news. 2019;1:133–134. (in Russ.).
11. Wu Y.H., Lewis M., Rigaud A.S. Cognitive Function and Digital Device Use in Older Adults Attending a Memory Clinic. Geriatrics & Gerontology. 2019;5:2333721419844886. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/2333721419844886
12. Soldatova G.U., Vishneva A.E. Features of the development of the cognitive sphere in children with different online activities: is there a golden mean? Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2019;3(105):97–118. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2019270307
13. Zhou M., Ding X.J. Internet use, depression, and cognitive outcomes among Chinese adolescents // Community psychology. 2021. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22779
14. Shabunova A.A., Korolenko A.V. Childrens involvement in digital space: gadgetization trends and threats to human development. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations. 2019;3(4):430–443. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.35634/2587-9030-2019-3-4-430-443
15. Small G.W., Lee J., Kaufman A. et al. Brain health consequences of digital technology use. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience. 2020;22(2):179–187. DOI: http://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/gsmall
16. Sorochinskii P.V. Virtual reality as a means of memory development. Psikhologiya kogni-tivnykh protsessov = Psychology of Cognitive Processes. 2021;10:142–150. (in Russ.).
17. Averin V.A., Malikova T.V., Kirillov D.S., Zemskih F.V. Development of cognitive skills using virtual reality technology. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya i pedagogika = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. 2017;7(2):154–168. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2017.204
18. Soboleva E.V. The possibilities of the digital gamification resources for supporting cognitive personality development. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Science for Education Today. 2018;8(5):159–175. (in Russ.). DOI: http://doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1805.10
19. Kovess-Masfety V., Keyes K., Hamilton A. et al. Is time spent playing video games associated with mental health, cognitive and social skills in young children? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2016;51(3):349–357. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1179-6
20. Fabio R.A., Ingrassia M., Massa M. Transient and Long-Term Improvements in Cognitive Processes following Video Games: An Italian Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;19(1):78. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010078
21. Richlan F., Schubert J., Mayer R. et al. Action video gaming and the brain: fMRI effects without behavioral effects in visual and verbal cognitive tasks. Brain and Behavior. 2017;8(1):e00877. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.877
22. West R., Swing E.L., Anderson C.A., Prot S. The Contrasting Effects of an Action Video Game on Visuo-Spatial Processing and Proactive Cognitive Control. International Journal of Environmenta Research and Public Health. 2020;17(14):5160. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145160
23. Clemenson G.D., Stark C.E. Virtual Environmental Enrichment through Video Games Improves Hippocampal-Associated Memory. Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;35(49):16116–16125. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2580-15.2015
24. Sousa C.V., Hwang J., Cabrera-Perez R. et al. Active video games in fully immersive virtual reality elicit moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and improve cognitive performance in sedentary college students. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2022;11(2):164–171. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2021.05.002
25. Hwang J., Lu A.S. Narrative and active video game in separate and additive effects of physical activity and cognitive function among young adults. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):11020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29274-0
26. Stanmore E., Stubbs B., Vancampfort D. et al. The effect of active video games on cognitive functioning in clinical and non-clinical populations: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017;78:34–43. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.011
27. Jahouh M., González-Bernal J.J., González-Santos J. et al. Impact of an Intervention with Wii Video Games on the Autonomy of Activities of Daily Living and Psychological-Cognitive Components in the Institutionalized Elderly. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(4):1570. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041570
28. Wang P., Zhu X.T., Liu H.H. et al. Age-related cognitive effects of videogame playing across the adult life span. Games for Health Journal. 2017;6(4):237–248. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2017.0005
29. Shibkova D.Z., Baiguzhin P.A., Gerasev A.D., Aizman R.I. The impact of digital learning technologies on functional and psychophysiological responses of the organism: an analytical literature review. Science for Education Today. 2021;11(3):125–141. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2017.0005

References on translit

-
Published
2022-12-29
How to Cite
Ignatova, Y., Makarova, I., Stepanenko, V., & Bagdasarov, A. (2022). Impact of digital technologies on human cognitive abilities (a review). Psychology. Psychophysiology, 15(4), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps220407
Section
Psychophysiology