ВЗАИМОСВЯЗЬ РАЗЛИЧНЫХ ПОКАЗАТЕЛЕЙ МОТОРНОЙ АСИММЕТРИИ РУК У ПЕРВОКЛАССНИКОВ, ОБСЛЕДОВАННЫХ В ДИНАМИКЕ УЧЕБНОГО ГОДА
Keywords:
functional interhemispheric asymmetry, motor asymmetry, children, education environment, adaptation.
Abstract
The article deals with the assessment of motor asymmetry in first graders during manual tasks. Motor asymmetry was measured in the same children (n = 89) by various methods: preference test, handgrip test, and unfamiliar task performance test (instrumental test). At the beginning of an academic year, despite the resemblance of children’s distribution in terms of interhemispheric asymmetry in various tests, there are no statistically significant correlations between the overall result of the asymmetry profile assessment by the preference test and by the handgrip test or the test performed with the motion measuring device. The results for determining a dominant hand in the preference test do not correlate with the results of the handgrip test. However, we revealed a correlation between this indicator and the asymmetry of motion duration in the instrumental test: R = 0.258; p = 0.024. The spring examination of the same sample revealed the changes in lateralization in some children as a result of the preference test, handgrip test, and instrumental test. However, the changes in the results of the preference test were individual, while the changes in the unfamiliar task performance test were revealed in the majority of children. We also found the correlations between the results of the instrumental test and other tests such as the asymmetry of motion smoothness and handedness in the ‘applause’ test (R = 0.259; p = 0.035), the asymmetry of the accuracy of flexors and asymmetry of the handgrip test (R= –0.227; p = 0.037).Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Gorbunov A.V., Molotkova O.A., Efimova T.N., Dronova G.I. [Determination of the Dominant Hemisphere of the Brain in Children of School Age and in Patients with a Neurological Profile]. Vestnik
Tambovskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennyei Tekhnicheskie Nauki [Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences]. 2014, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 81–82 (in Russ.)
2. Gutnik B.I., Kobrin V.I. [Manual Motor Asymmetry: Central or Peripheral Origin?]. Asimmetriya [Asymmetry]. 2007, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69–70.(in Russ.)
3. Zhavoronkova L.A. Neyrofiziologiya: mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya mozga cheloveka (pravshi-levshi): monografiya [Neurophysiology: Hemispheric asymmetry of the Human Brain (Right-Handed – Left-Handed): a Monograph]. M.: Yurayt Publishing House, 2019. 217 p. (in Russ.)
4. Illarionova A.V., Kapilevich L.V. [The Impact of the Development of Coordination Abilities on the Level of Motor Asymmetry]. Fizicheskaya Kul'tura, Zzdravookhraneniye i Obrazovaniye. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy Nauchno-Praktichesko yKonferentsii, Pposvyashchennoy Pamyati V.S. Pirusskogo. Pod redaktsiyey Prof. V.G. Shil'ko [Physical Culture, Health and Education. Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of V.S. Pirusky. Edited by Prof. V.G. Shilko]. Tomsk, 2015, pp. 57–59. (in Russ.)
5. Pankova N.B., Karganov M.Yu. [Changes in Motor Asymmetry in First-Graders under the Influence of Factors of the Educational Environment]. Asimmetriya [Asymmetry]. 2013, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 20–31. (in Russ.)
6. HachaturovaI. Eh. [The Nature of the Individual Profile of Asymmetry in the Process of the Annual Cycle of Training Athletes Shooters]. Resursy Konkurentosposobnosti Sportsmenov: Teoriya i Praktika Realizatsii [Sportsmen Competitiveness Resources: Theory and Practice of Implementation]. 2015, no. 3. pp. 237–239. (in Russ.)
7. Tsisnetskiy A.K., Razumnikova O.M., Poveshchenko A.F. [Determining the Level of Anxiety in Military Personnel with Different Motor Asymmetries during the Period of Adaptation in the Military
Team]. Sibirskiy Pedagogicheskiy Zhurnal [Siberian Pedagogical Journal]. 2013, no. 2, pp. 210–212. (in Russ.)
8. Chemerchey O.A. [Classification of Motor Symmetry of the Upper and Lower Extremities of Performing Technical Actions in Applied Forms of Martial Arts]. Uchenyye Zapiski Universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta [Scientific Notes of the P.F. Lesgaft University]. 2017, no. 6(148), pp. 234–239. (in Russ.)
9. Chermit K.D., Zabolotniy A.G., El'nikova O.O. [Symmetry of the Kinematic Structure of
Human Locomotion]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 4: YestestvennoMatematicheskiye i Tekhnicheskiye Nauki [Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series 4: Natural Mathematical and Technical Sciences]. 2016, no. 4(191), pp. 108–121. (in Russ.)
10. Bagesteiro L.B., Sainburg R.L. Handedness: Dominant Arm Advantages in Control of Limb Dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, vol. 88(5), pp. 2408–2421. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00901.2001
11. Bonnechère B. Physical Rehabilitation, Train the Brain!Med. Sci. 2017, vol. 33(10), pp. 887– 890. DOI: 10.1051/medsci/20173310021 (in french).
12. Dounskaia N., Shimansky Y. Strategy of Arm Movement Control is Determined by Minimization of Neural Effort for Joint Coordination. Exp. Brain Res. 2016, vol. 234(6), pp. 1335–1350. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4610-z.
13. Mutha P.K., Haaland K.Y., Sainburg R.L. The Effects of Brain Lateralization on Motor Control and Adaptation. J. Mot. Behav. 2012, vol. 44(6), pp. 455–469. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.747482.
14. Sainburg R.L. Convergent Models of Handedness and Brain Lateralization. Front. Psychol. 2014, vol. 5, no. 1092. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01092.
Tambovskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Estestvennyei Tekhnicheskie Nauki [Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences]. 2014, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 81–82 (in Russ.)
2. Gutnik B.I., Kobrin V.I. [Manual Motor Asymmetry: Central or Peripheral Origin?]. Asimmetriya [Asymmetry]. 2007, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69–70.(in Russ.)
3. Zhavoronkova L.A. Neyrofiziologiya: mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya mozga cheloveka (pravshi-levshi): monografiya [Neurophysiology: Hemispheric asymmetry of the Human Brain (Right-Handed – Left-Handed): a Monograph]. M.: Yurayt Publishing House, 2019. 217 p. (in Russ.)
4. Illarionova A.V., Kapilevich L.V. [The Impact of the Development of Coordination Abilities on the Level of Motor Asymmetry]. Fizicheskaya Kul'tura, Zzdravookhraneniye i Obrazovaniye. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy Nauchno-Praktichesko yKonferentsii, Pposvyashchennoy Pamyati V.S. Pirusskogo. Pod redaktsiyey Prof. V.G. Shil'ko [Physical Culture, Health and Education. Proceedings of the IX International Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of V.S. Pirusky. Edited by Prof. V.G. Shilko]. Tomsk, 2015, pp. 57–59. (in Russ.)
5. Pankova N.B., Karganov M.Yu. [Changes in Motor Asymmetry in First-Graders under the Influence of Factors of the Educational Environment]. Asimmetriya [Asymmetry]. 2013, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 20–31. (in Russ.)
6. HachaturovaI. Eh. [The Nature of the Individual Profile of Asymmetry in the Process of the Annual Cycle of Training Athletes Shooters]. Resursy Konkurentosposobnosti Sportsmenov: Teoriya i Praktika Realizatsii [Sportsmen Competitiveness Resources: Theory and Practice of Implementation]. 2015, no. 3. pp. 237–239. (in Russ.)
7. Tsisnetskiy A.K., Razumnikova O.M., Poveshchenko A.F. [Determining the Level of Anxiety in Military Personnel with Different Motor Asymmetries during the Period of Adaptation in the Military
Team]. Sibirskiy Pedagogicheskiy Zhurnal [Siberian Pedagogical Journal]. 2013, no. 2, pp. 210–212. (in Russ.)
8. Chemerchey O.A. [Classification of Motor Symmetry of the Upper and Lower Extremities of Performing Technical Actions in Applied Forms of Martial Arts]. Uchenyye Zapiski Universiteta im. P.F. Lesgafta [Scientific Notes of the P.F. Lesgaft University]. 2017, no. 6(148), pp. 234–239. (in Russ.)
9. Chermit K.D., Zabolotniy A.G., El'nikova O.O. [Symmetry of the Kinematic Structure of
Human Locomotion]. Vestnik Adygeyskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 4: YestestvennoMatematicheskiye i Tekhnicheskiye Nauki [Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series 4: Natural Mathematical and Technical Sciences]. 2016, no. 4(191), pp. 108–121. (in Russ.)
10. Bagesteiro L.B., Sainburg R.L. Handedness: Dominant Arm Advantages in Control of Limb Dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 2002, vol. 88(5), pp. 2408–2421. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00901.2001
11. Bonnechère B. Physical Rehabilitation, Train the Brain!Med. Sci. 2017, vol. 33(10), pp. 887– 890. DOI: 10.1051/medsci/20173310021 (in french).
12. Dounskaia N., Shimansky Y. Strategy of Arm Movement Control is Determined by Minimization of Neural Effort for Joint Coordination. Exp. Brain Res. 2016, vol. 234(6), pp. 1335–1350. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4610-z.
13. Mutha P.K., Haaland K.Y., Sainburg R.L. The Effects of Brain Lateralization on Motor Control and Adaptation. J. Mot. Behav. 2012, vol. 44(6), pp. 455–469. DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2012.747482.
14. Sainburg R.L. Convergent Models of Handedness and Brain Lateralization. Front. Psychol. 2014, vol. 5, no. 1092. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01092.
References on translit
Published
2019-07-15
How to Cite
Pankova, N., & Karganov, M. (2019). ВЗАИМОСВЯЗЬ РАЗЛИЧНЫХ ПОКАЗАТЕЛЕЙ МОТОРНОЙ АСИММЕТРИИ РУК У ПЕРВОКЛАССНИКОВ, ОБСЛЕДОВАННЫХ В ДИНАМИКЕ УЧЕБНОГО ГОДА. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 12(2), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps190206
Issue
Section
Psychophysiology
Copyright (c) 2019 Psychology. Psychophysiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
