CASE-METHOD AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR REFLECTION DEVELOPMENT
Keywords:
case-method, directions of reflection, reflection modalities, decentration, identification, identity, position.
Abstract
The publication reveals and experimentally confirms key opportunities of using a case method for developing reflection, which include: organization of personal experience awareness and learning new subject identifications, identities, and positions. It is shown that the process of developing reflection is unfolding through the organization of decentration, reconstruction, subjectivation, objectification and approbation of new experience. Two versions of reflection development (toward self-development (reflection of the reflection) and toward system informa tion processing) received experimental confirmation. It was determined that due to organized work with the case, a reflection tendency toward distortions, characteristic of youthful age, was significantly changed toward the subject's true representation of his reflection. The diagnostic, developmental and control characteristics of the matrix reflexive form, which represents the modal-intentional model of reflection, were indicated.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Karpov A.V. [Reflexivity as a Mental Property and a Method for its Diagnosis]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 2003, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 45–57. (in Russ.)
2. Karpov A.V., Karpov A.A., Markova E.V. Psikhologiya prinyatiya resheniya v upravlencheskoy deyatel’nosti. Metasistemnyy podkhod [Psychology of Decision-making in Management. Metasystem Approach]. Moscow, RAO Publ., Yaroslavl', YArGU Publ., 2016. 644 p.
3. Karpov A.V., Skityaeva I.M. Psihologiya metakognitivnyh processov lichnosti [Psychology of Metacognitive Processes of a Personality]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2005. 352 p.
4. Levashkina A.O. [The Study of the Characteristics of the Identification of Children of Preschool Age with Parents in Complete and Incomplete Families]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin]. 2012, no. 3, vol. II “Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki”, pp. 262–265. (in Russ.)
5. Leont’yev D.A. [New Benchmarks of Understanding of Personality in Psychology: from the Necessary to the Possible]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 2011, no. 1, pp. 3–27. (in Russ.)
6. Leont’yev D.A., Osin E.N. [Reflection “Good” and “Bad”: from the Explanatory Model to the Differential Diagnosis]. Psikhologiya [Psychology]. Moscow, VSH·E Publ., 2014, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 110–135. (in Russ.)
7. Mamardashvili M.K. Psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti [Psychological Topology of the Path]. M. Prust “V poiskakh utrachennogo vremeni” [In Search of Lost Time.]. St. Petersburg, Russkiy Khristianskiy gumanitarnyy institut, TOO Zhurnal Neva, 1997. 571 p.
8. Popova L.V. [Methods of Studying Identification Processes]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of
Psychology]. 1988, no. 1, pp. 163–168. (in Russ.)
9. Rubinshteyn S.L. Chelovek i mir [Man and the World]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1997. 191 p.
10. Sayto I., Nagao T. Kokologiya. Psikhologicheskiye igry [Kokology. Psychological Games]. Moscow, Sofiya, Gelios, 2002. 192 p.
11 Sizikova T.E. [Meta-model of Reflection Within the Framework of Meta-ontology]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Siberian Psychological Journal]. 2018a, no. 68, pp. 6–31. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/17267080/66/1.
12. Sizikova T.E. [Modal-Differential Approach in Psychodiagnostics Reflection]. Vestnik KGU. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika [Bulletin of KSU. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics]. 2018b, no. 2, pp. 51–60. (in Russ.)
13. Sizikova T.E., Durachenko O.A. [Psychodiagnostic Methods of Reflexion as a Method of Developing Reflection. Part 1]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnyye nauki [Bulletin of the Yaroslavl State University. P.G. Demidov. Humanities Series]. 2018v, no. 3 (46), pp. 81–86. (in Russ.)
14. Simonova O.A. [On the Formation of the Sociology of Identity]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. 2008, no. 3, pp. 45–61.
15. Slobodchikov V.I., Isayev E.I. Osnovy psikhologicheskoy antropologii. Psikhologiya cheloveka. Vvedeniye v psikhologiyu sub”yektivnosti [Fundamentals of Psychological Anthropology. Human Psychology. Introduction to the Psychology of Subjectivity]. Moscow, Shkola-Press, 1995. 384 p.
16. Slobodchikov V.I. [The Formation of Reflexive Consciousness in Early Ontogenesis]. Problemy refleksii [Problems of Reflection]. Novosibirsk, Institut filosofii RAN, 1987, pp. 60–68. (in Russ.)
17. Sharov A.S. [The Ontology of Reflection: Nature, Functions and Mechanisms]. Refleksivnyye protsessy i upravleniye [Reflexive Processes and Management]. 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 71–92. (in Russ.)
18. Shigabetdinova G.M. [The Phenomenon of Reflection: the Boundaries of the Concept]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky]. 2014, no. 2 (1), pp. 415–422. (in Russ.)
19. Eydemiller E.G. Detskaya psikhiatriya [Child Psychiatry]. St. Petersburg, PITER Publ., 2005. 1120 p.
20. Hall S., Du Gay P. (Eds.) Introduction: Who needs identity? Questions of cultural identity. London, Sage Publ., 1996. 196 p.
2. Karpov A.V., Karpov A.A., Markova E.V. Psikhologiya prinyatiya resheniya v upravlencheskoy deyatel’nosti. Metasistemnyy podkhod [Psychology of Decision-making in Management. Metasystem Approach]. Moscow, RAO Publ., Yaroslavl', YArGU Publ., 2016. 644 p.
3. Karpov A.V., Skityaeva I.M. Psihologiya metakognitivnyh processov lichnosti [Psychology of Metacognitive Processes of a Personality]. Moscow, Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2005. 352 p.
4. Levashkina A.O. [The Study of the Characteristics of the Identification of Children of Preschool Age with Parents in Complete and Incomplete Families]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin]. 2012, no. 3, vol. II “Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki”, pp. 262–265. (in Russ.)
5. Leont’yev D.A. [New Benchmarks of Understanding of Personality in Psychology: from the Necessary to the Possible]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology]. Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 2011, no. 1, pp. 3–27. (in Russ.)
6. Leont’yev D.A., Osin E.N. [Reflection “Good” and “Bad”: from the Explanatory Model to the Differential Diagnosis]. Psikhologiya [Psychology]. Moscow, VSH·E Publ., 2014, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 110–135. (in Russ.)
7. Mamardashvili M.K. Psikhologicheskaya topologiya puti [Psychological Topology of the Path]. M. Prust “V poiskakh utrachennogo vremeni” [In Search of Lost Time.]. St. Petersburg, Russkiy Khristianskiy gumanitarnyy institut, TOO Zhurnal Neva, 1997. 571 p.
8. Popova L.V. [Methods of Studying Identification Processes]. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of
Psychology]. 1988, no. 1, pp. 163–168. (in Russ.)
9. Rubinshteyn S.L. Chelovek i mir [Man and the World]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1997. 191 p.
10. Sayto I., Nagao T. Kokologiya. Psikhologicheskiye igry [Kokology. Psychological Games]. Moscow, Sofiya, Gelios, 2002. 192 p.
11 Sizikova T.E. [Meta-model of Reflection Within the Framework of Meta-ontology]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Siberian Psychological Journal]. 2018a, no. 68, pp. 6–31. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.17223/17267080/66/1.
12. Sizikova T.E. [Modal-Differential Approach in Psychodiagnostics Reflection]. Vestnik KGU. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika [Bulletin of KSU. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics]. 2018b, no. 2, pp. 51–60. (in Russ.)
13. Sizikova T.E., Durachenko O.A. [Psychodiagnostic Methods of Reflexion as a Method of Developing Reflection. Part 1]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova. Seriya Gumanitarnyye nauki [Bulletin of the Yaroslavl State University. P.G. Demidov. Humanities Series]. 2018v, no. 3 (46), pp. 81–86. (in Russ.)
14. Simonova O.A. [On the Formation of the Sociology of Identity]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal]. 2008, no. 3, pp. 45–61.
15. Slobodchikov V.I., Isayev E.I. Osnovy psikhologicheskoy antropologii. Psikhologiya cheloveka. Vvedeniye v psikhologiyu sub”yektivnosti [Fundamentals of Psychological Anthropology. Human Psychology. Introduction to the Psychology of Subjectivity]. Moscow, Shkola-Press, 1995. 384 p.
16. Slobodchikov V.I. [The Formation of Reflexive Consciousness in Early Ontogenesis]. Problemy refleksii [Problems of Reflection]. Novosibirsk, Institut filosofii RAN, 1987, pp. 60–68. (in Russ.)
17. Sharov A.S. [The Ontology of Reflection: Nature, Functions and Mechanisms]. Refleksivnyye protsessy i upravleniye [Reflexive Processes and Management]. 2005, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 71–92. (in Russ.)
18. Shigabetdinova G.M. [The Phenomenon of Reflection: the Boundaries of the Concept]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky]. 2014, no. 2 (1), pp. 415–422. (in Russ.)
19. Eydemiller E.G. Detskaya psikhiatriya [Child Psychiatry]. St. Petersburg, PITER Publ., 2005. 1120 p.
20. Hall S., Du Gay P. (Eds.) Introduction: Who needs identity? Questions of cultural identity. London, Sage Publ., 1996. 196 p.
References on translit
Published
2019-07-15
How to Cite
Sizikova, T., & Durachenko, O. (2019). CASE-METHOD AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR REFLECTION DEVELOPMENT. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 12(2), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps190202
Issue
Section
Общая психология
Copyright (c) 2019 Psychology. Psychophysiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
