EFFECTS OF SCREEN TIME ON MOTOR ASYMMETRY IN PRIMARY SCHOOLCHILDREN
Abstract
Background. The modern model of hemispheric asymmetries includes genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors. Therefore, this makes relevant the study of the effect of the academic environment on hemispheric asymmetries in schoolchildren. The paper aims to identify the effect of screen time on hand asymmetry among primary schoolchildren. Materials and methods. The study involved 2677 girls and 1528 boys of grades 1–4 from 66 schools in Moscow. The surveys were carried out twice a year (in October and March-April), all samples were independent. Psychomotor coordination was measured during motor tests by means of the movement measuring device, which allowed to identify movement speed and accuracy, as well as movement smoothness and response. The volume of school and out-of-school screen time was assessed by teachers based on relevant hygienic standards. Results. The results obtained show that screen time did not affect the asymmetry of speed indicators. Movement accuracy tests showed that groups with maximal screen time (3 or more times higher than that of hygienic standards) had increased left hand activity indicators in terms of flexor muscles by spring. In girls of the maximum screen time group, movement smoothness tests showed increased right hand activity indicators in spring tests. In boys, similar changes were found in the groups with both maximum and lower screen time. Similar results were obtained for reaction time (reaction to light). It is important that the use of computers within the limits of hygienic standards did not affect the indicators of motor asymmetry. Conclusion. The data obtained show that students of grades 3-4 with high levels of screen time developed a new motor skill by the end of the academic year. Such changes can be considered as an adaptive response to a computer-oriented educational environment.
Downloads
References
2. Vallortigara G., Rogers L.J. A function for the bicameral mind. Cortex. 2020;124:274–285. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.11.018
3. Gribanov A.V., Anikina N.Yu., Kottsova O.N. [Distribution of Cerebral Energy Processes in Young People Permanently Living in the Arctic Region]. Zhurnal mediko-biologicheskikh issle-dovaniy = Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2019;7(1):118–123. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/issn2542-1298.2019.7.1.118
4. Kiss D.S., Toth I., Jocsak G. et al. Functional Aspects of Hypothalamic Asymmetry. Brain Sciences. 2020;10(6):389. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10060389
5. Petrazzini M.E.M., Sovrano V.A., Vallortigara G. et al. Brain and Behavioral Asymmetry: A Lesson from Fish. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 2020;(14):e11. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2020.00011
6. Alqadah A., Hsieh Y.-W., Morrissey Z.D. et al. Asymmetric development of the nervous system. Developmental Dynamics. 2018;247(1):124–137. DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.24595
7. Signore I.A., Palma K., Concha M.L. Nodal signalling and asymmetry of the nervous system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological. 2016;371(1710):e20150401. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0401
8. Hamada H. Molecular and cellular basis of left-right asymmetry in vertebrates. Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B: Physical and Biological Sciences. 2020;96(7):273–296. DOI: 10.2183/pjab.96.021
9. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Zago L., Cochet H. et al. Development of handedness, anatomical and functional brain lateralization. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2020;(173):99–105. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64150-2.00011-3
10. McManus C. Half a century of handedness research: Myths, truths; fictions, facts; backwards, but mostly forwards. Brain and Neuroscience Advances. 2019;(3):e2398212818820513. DOI: 10.1177/2398212818820513
11. Bondi D., Prete G., Malatesta G. et al. Laterality in Children: Evidence for Task-Dependent Lateralization of Motor Functions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(18):e6705. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186705
12. Güntürkün O., Ocklenburg S. Ontogenesis of Lateralization. Neuron. 2017;94, (2):249–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.045
13. Schmitz J., Güntürkün O., Ocklenburg S. Building an Asymmetrical Brain: The Molecular Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;(10):e982. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00982
14. Malatesta G., Marzoli D., Prete G. et al. Human Lateralization, Maternal Effects and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2021;15:e668520. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.668520
15. OConnor D.B., Thayer J.F., Vedhara K. Stress and Health: A Review of Psychobiological Processes. Annual Review of Psychology. 2021;(72):663–688. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-062520-122331
16. Kuchma V.R., Sedova A.S., Stepanova M.I., Rapoport I.K., Polenova M.A., Sokolova S.B., Aleksandrova I.E., Chubarovsky V.V. [Life and wellbeing of children and adolescents studying remotely during the epidemic of a new coronavirus infection]. Voprosy shkolnoy i universitetskoy meditsiny i zdorovya = School and University Medicine and Health Issues. 2020(2):4–23. (in Russ.).
17. Baiguzhin P.A., Shibkova D.Z., Aizman R.I. [Factors affecting the psychophysiological processes of perception of information in the conditions of informatization of the educational environment]. Science for Education Today, 2019(5):58–70. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.1905.04
18. Pankova N.B., Alchinova I.B., Kovaleva O.I., Lebedeva M.A., Khlebnikova N.N., Cherepov A.B., Noskin L.A., Karganov M.Yu. [Accuracy and speed of hand control in primary schoolchildren with different screen time], Science for Education Today. 2021;11(3):142–160. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762
19. Pankova N.B., Lebedeva M.A., Noskin L.A., Khlebnikova N.N., Karganov M.Yu. [The Effect of Different Volumes of Computer Load on the Latent Periods of a Simple Sensorimotor Reaction in Primary Schoolchildren]. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2020;13(2):112–122. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14529/jpps200210
20. Semenova M.V., Shibkova D.Z. [Gender and Age-Related Features of Psychomotor Indicators in 10–16-year-old Students (Longitudinal Study)]. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2021;14(1):119–127. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14529/jpps210112
21. Pankova N.B., Karganov M.Yu. [Correlation Between the Parameters of Motor Asymmetry in First Graders During Manual Tasks]. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2019;12(2):72–79. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.14529/jpps190206
22. Kottsova O. N., Anikina N. Yu., Gribanov A. V. [Structural-Functional Peculiarities of Physiological Systems in Persons with Different Types of Hemispheric Domination (Review)]. Ekologiya cheloveka = Human Ecology. 2019(8):32–40. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33396/1728-0862-8-32-40
23. Rinaldi L., Di Luca S., Toneatto C. et al. The effects of hemispheric dominance, literacy acquisition, and handedness on the development of visuospatial attention: A study in preschoolers and second graders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2020;195:e104830. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104830
24. Dobrin A.V. [Features of the relationship of the profile of functional sensorimotor asymmetry with the level of anxiety of 7–8 year old boys and girls]. Psikhologiya obrazovaniya v polikulturnom prostranstve = Psychology of Education in a Multicultural Space. 2019(4 (48)):7–18. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.24888/2073-8439-2019-48-4-7-17
25. Nikolaeva E.I., Iluychina V.A., Vergunov E.G. [Peculiarities of interhemispheric functional asymmetry of the frontal region in 4–7 year-old children with mental development and speech development delay]. Kompleksnyye issledovaniya detstva = Comprehensive Child Studies. 2019;1(1):11–21. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.33910/2687-0233-2019-1-1-11-21
26. Rabadanova A.I., Cherkesova D.U., Ashurbekova M.I. [Functional asymmetry features in the formation of Internet-addiction]. Uspekhi sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya = Successes of Modern Science and Education. 2017;2(3):96–100.
References on translit
-Copyright (c) 2021 Psychology. Psychophysiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.