Influence of time post-onset of post-stroke aphasia and lesion size on the shift of auditory speech laterality in dichotic listening of c-v-c words
Keywords:
dichotic listening task, ear advantage, right ear extinction, post-stroke aphasia, interhemispheric interaction, neuroplasticity, neuropsychological rehabilitation, speech recovery, dominant hemisphere, lesion effect
Abstract
Introduction. Aphasia disorders are frequent consequences of vascular lesions of the brain. The study of ways and patterns of compensation for speech disorders, mechanisms of intra- and interhemispheric reorganization in speech disorders helps to develop a scientifically based methodology for aphasia rehabilitation. Aims. This study aims to identify the predominant vector of auditory-speech asymmetry in the dichotic listening task with c-v-c words among patients with post-stroke acoustic mnestic and efferent motor aphasia with different time post-onset and lesion size. Materials and methods. The dichotic listening task: 16 paired series of 4 c-v-c words in each series. Subjects: 110 post-stroke aphasia patients with different lesion sizes and time post-onset. Efferent motor aphasia (EM) – 57 patients, acoustic mnestic aphasia (AM) – 53 patients. Time post-onset: 31.5 months ± 28.5 months. The sign and the right ear scores (RES), the ratio of responses with the left and right ear advantage were employed. Statistical analysis: Mann–Whitney U-tests, Spearman's rank correlation, φ-criteria, ANOVA. All results were quoted as 2-tailed p-values with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results.There are different response patterns in AM and EM aphasia, depending on the aphasia post-onset and the lesion size. For AM, the lesion effect (“–RES”) is characteristic for different time post-onset and lesion size. In EM, the RES sign depends on the time post-onset. In the case of fewer than 12 months, “–RES” is noted. For more than a year, regardless of the lesion size, a high frequency of “+RES” is registered. Conclusion. The data allow developing a relevant methodology for aphasia rehabilitation taking into account the importance of right hemisphere participation in speech recovery.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Nissim N.R., Moberg P.J., Hamilton R.H. Efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation (tDCS or TMS) paired with language therapy in the treatment of primary progressive aphasia: an exploratory meta-analysis. Brain Sciences. 2020;10:597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090597.
2. Shipkova K.M. Quality of life, personal expectations and needs of patients with aphasia. Aktualnye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya = Actual problems of psychological knowledge. 2015;3(4):114–125. (in Russ.).
3. Broadbent D.E. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1954;47:191–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0054182.
4. Kimoura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1961;15:156–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083219.
5. Sparks R., Goodglass H., Nickel B. Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemisphere lesions. Cortex. 1970;3:249–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(70)80014-4.
6. Crosson B., Warren L. Dichotic ear preference for C-V-C words in Wernikes and Brocas aphasias. Cortex. 1981;17:249–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452 (81)80045-7.
7. Johnson J., Sommers R., Weidner W. Dichotic ear preference in aphasia. Journal of Hearing Research. 1977;20:116–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2001.116.
8. Hugdahl K., Westerhausen R. Speech processing asymmetry revealed by dichotic listening and functional brain imaging. Neuropsychologia. 2016;93(B):466–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.011.
9. DAnselmo A., Marzoli D., Brancucci A. The influence of memory and attention on the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Hearing Research. 2016; 342:144–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.012.
10. Voyer D., Hearn N. Auditory semantic priming and the dichotic right ear advantage. Brain and Cognition. 2019;135:103575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2 019.05.013.
11. Cameron S., Glyde H., Dillon H. et al. The dichotic digits difference test (DDdT): development, normative data, and test-retest reliability studies. Part 1. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2016;27(6):458–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.15084.
12. Kotik B.C. Neiropsikhologicheskii analiz mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodeistviya [Neuropsychological analysis of hemispheric interaction]. Rostov-on-Don. Rostov University. 1988:192 (in Russ.).
13. Prete G., DAnselmo A., Tommasi L. et al. Modulation of the dichotic right ear advantage during bilateral but not unilateral transcranial random noise stimulation. Brain and Cognition. 2018;123:81–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.20 18.03.003.
14. Studer-Luethi B. Is Training with the N-back task more effective than with other tasks? N-Back vs. dichotic listening vs. simple listening. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement. 2021;5:434–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-020-00202-3.
15. Westerhausen R. A primer on dichotic listening as a paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition. 2019;24(6):740–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019. 1598426.
16. Costa M.J., Santos S.N.D., Schochat E. Dichotic sentence identification test in Portuguese:
a study in young adults. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2021;87(4):478–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.11.018.
17. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Crivello F., Mazoyer B. Is the planum temporale surface area a marker of hemispheric or regional language lateralization? Brain Structure and Function. 2018;223:1217–1228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1551-7.
18. Linebaugh C. Dichotic ear preference in aphasia: another view. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1978;21(3):598–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2103.5 98.
19. Xing S., Lacey E.H., Skipper-Kallal L.M. et al. Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke Brain. 2016;139:227–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv323.
20. Kourtidou E., Kasselimis D., Angelopoulou G. et al. The role of the right hemisphere white matter tracts in chronic aphasic patients after damage of the language tracts in the left hemisphere. Frontiers in Human Neurosience. 2021;15:635750d. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.635750.
21. Lukic S., Barbieri E., Wang X. et al. Right hemisphere grey matter volume and language functions in stroke aphasia. Neural Plastisity. 2017:5601509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5601509.
Hartwigsen G., Saur D. Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia-insights into plasticity of the human language. Neuroimage. 2019;190:14–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.056.
23. Shipkova K.M. Changing of the profile of auditory-speech asymmetry in aphasia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Bulletin of the Moscow University. Psychology. 2013;4:65–75. (in Russ.).
24. Purdy M., McCullagh J. Dichotic listening training following neurological injury in adults: a pilot study. Hearing, Balance and Communication. 2020;18(1):16–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2169 5717.2019.1692591.
25. Gorecka M.M., Vasylenko O., Rodríguez-Aranda C. Dichotic listening while walking: a dual-task paradigm examining gait asymmetries in healthy older and younger adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2020;42:794–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1811207.
26. Цветкова Л.С., Ахутина Т.В., Пылаева Н.М. Методика оценки речи при афазии. М.: МГУ, 1981. 68 с. [Tsvetkova L.S., Akhutina T.V., Pylaeva N.M. Metodika ocenki rechi pri afazii [Method of speech assessment in aphasia]. Moscow. MGU. 1981:68. (in Russ.).]
27. Richter M., Miltner W.H.R., Straube Th. Association between therapy outcome and right-hemispheric activation in chronic aphasia. Brain. 2008;131:1391–1401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ brain/awn043.
28. Bruckert L., Thompson P.A., Watkins K.E. et al. Investigating the effects of handedness on the consistency of lateralization for speech production and semantic processing tasks using functional transcranial Doppler sonography. Laterality: Asymmetries of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognition. 2021;26(6):680–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2021.1898416.
29. Karbe H., Thiel A., Weber-Luxenburger G. et al. Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: What is the contribution of the right hemisphere? Brain and Language. 1998;64(2):215–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1998.1961.
30. Guadalupe T., Kong X.-Z., Akkermans S.E.A. et al. Relations between hemispheric asymmetries of grey matter and auditory processing of spoken syllables in 281 healthy adults. Brain Structure and Function. 2022;227(2):561–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02220-z.
31. Moulton E., Magno S., Valabregue R. et al. Acute diffusivity biomarkers for prediction of motor and language outcome in mild-to-severe stroke patients. Stroke. 2019;50:2050–2056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024.
32. Martin P.I., Naeser M.A, Theoret H. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language. 2004;25(2):181–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-825654.
2. Shipkova K.M. Quality of life, personal expectations and needs of patients with aphasia. Aktualnye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya = Actual problems of psychological knowledge. 2015;3(4):114–125. (in Russ.).
3. Broadbent D.E. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1954;47:191–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0054182.
4. Kimoura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 1961;15:156–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083219.
5. Sparks R., Goodglass H., Nickel B. Ipsilateral versus contralateral extinction in dichotic listening resulting from hemisphere lesions. Cortex. 1970;3:249–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(70)80014-4.
6. Crosson B., Warren L. Dichotic ear preference for C-V-C words in Wernikes and Brocas aphasias. Cortex. 1981;17:249–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452 (81)80045-7.
7. Johnson J., Sommers R., Weidner W. Dichotic ear preference in aphasia. Journal of Hearing Research. 1977;20:116–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2001.116.
8. Hugdahl K., Westerhausen R. Speech processing asymmetry revealed by dichotic listening and functional brain imaging. Neuropsychologia. 2016;93(B):466–481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.011.
9. DAnselmo A., Marzoli D., Brancucci A. The influence of memory and attention on the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Hearing Research. 2016; 342:144–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.012.
10. Voyer D., Hearn N. Auditory semantic priming and the dichotic right ear advantage. Brain and Cognition. 2019;135:103575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2 019.05.013.
11. Cameron S., Glyde H., Dillon H. et al. The dichotic digits difference test (DDdT): development, normative data, and test-retest reliability studies. Part 1. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2016;27(6):458–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.15084.
12. Kotik B.C. Neiropsikhologicheskii analiz mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodeistviya [Neuropsychological analysis of hemispheric interaction]. Rostov-on-Don. Rostov University. 1988:192 (in Russ.).
13. Prete G., DAnselmo A., Tommasi L. et al. Modulation of the dichotic right ear advantage during bilateral but not unilateral transcranial random noise stimulation. Brain and Cognition. 2018;123:81–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.20 18.03.003.
14. Studer-Luethi B. Is Training with the N-back task more effective than with other tasks? N-Back vs. dichotic listening vs. simple listening. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement. 2021;5:434–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-020-00202-3.
15. Westerhausen R. A primer on dichotic listening as a paradigm for the assessment of hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition. 2019;24(6):740–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2019. 1598426.
16. Costa M.J., Santos S.N.D., Schochat E. Dichotic sentence identification test in Portuguese:
a study in young adults. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2021;87(4):478–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.11.018.
17. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Crivello F., Mazoyer B. Is the planum temporale surface area a marker of hemispheric or regional language lateralization? Brain Structure and Function. 2018;223:1217–1228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1551-7.
18. Linebaugh C. Dichotic ear preference in aphasia: another view. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1978;21(3):598–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2103.5 98.
19. Xing S., Lacey E.H., Skipper-Kallal L.M. et al. Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke Brain. 2016;139:227–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv323.
20. Kourtidou E., Kasselimis D., Angelopoulou G. et al. The role of the right hemisphere white matter tracts in chronic aphasic patients after damage of the language tracts in the left hemisphere. Frontiers in Human Neurosience. 2021;15:635750d. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.635750.
21. Lukic S., Barbieri E., Wang X. et al. Right hemisphere grey matter volume and language functions in stroke aphasia. Neural Plastisity. 2017:5601509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5601509.
Hartwigsen G., Saur D. Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from aphasia-insights into plasticity of the human language. Neuroimage. 2019;190:14–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.056.
23. Shipkova K.M. Changing of the profile of auditory-speech asymmetry in aphasia. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Bulletin of the Moscow University. Psychology. 2013;4:65–75. (in Russ.).
24. Purdy M., McCullagh J. Dichotic listening training following neurological injury in adults: a pilot study. Hearing, Balance and Communication. 2020;18(1):16–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2169 5717.2019.1692591.
25. Gorecka M.M., Vasylenko O., Rodríguez-Aranda C. Dichotic listening while walking: a dual-task paradigm examining gait asymmetries in healthy older and younger adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2020;42:794–810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2020.1811207.
26. Цветкова Л.С., Ахутина Т.В., Пылаева Н.М. Методика оценки речи при афазии. М.: МГУ, 1981. 68 с. [Tsvetkova L.S., Akhutina T.V., Pylaeva N.M. Metodika ocenki rechi pri afazii [Method of speech assessment in aphasia]. Moscow. MGU. 1981:68. (in Russ.).]
27. Richter M., Miltner W.H.R., Straube Th. Association between therapy outcome and right-hemispheric activation in chronic aphasia. Brain. 2008;131:1391–1401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ brain/awn043.
28. Bruckert L., Thompson P.A., Watkins K.E. et al. Investigating the effects of handedness on the consistency of lateralization for speech production and semantic processing tasks using functional transcranial Doppler sonography. Laterality: Asymmetries of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognition. 2021;26(6):680–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2021.1898416.
29. Karbe H., Thiel A., Weber-Luxenburger G. et al. Brain plasticity in poststroke aphasia: What is the contribution of the right hemisphere? Brain and Language. 1998;64(2):215–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1998.1961.
30. Guadalupe T., Kong X.-Z., Akkermans S.E.A. et al. Relations between hemispheric asymmetries of grey matter and auditory processing of spoken syllables in 281 healthy adults. Brain Structure and Function. 2022;227(2):561–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02220-z.
31. Moulton E., Magno S., Valabregue R. et al. Acute diffusivity biomarkers for prediction of motor and language outcome in mild-to-severe stroke patients. Stroke. 2019;50:2050–2056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024.
32. Martin P.I., Naeser M.A, Theoret H. et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language. 2004;25(2):181–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-825654.
References on translit
-
Published
2022-07-05
How to Cite
Shipkova, K. (2022). Influence of time post-onset of post-stroke aphasia and lesion size on the shift of auditory speech laterality in dichotic listening of c-v-c words. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 15(2), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps220206
Issue
Section
Medical (clinical) psychology
Copyright (c) 2022 Psychology. Psychophysiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
