PSYCHOLOGY STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT THE PERSONALITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITH LIMITED HEALTH OPPORTUNITIES
Abstract
Background. The modern education system needs competent and qualified specialists, including psychologists who work with students with disabilities. Training psychologists who are able to work in a modern system of inclusive education is becoming the most important task of higher education. Professional training involves the formation of objective ideas about a person with disabilities. Aim. The paper aims to identify the ideas of psychology students about the personality of an individual with disabilities. Materials and methods. The study involved 53 3rd-year psychology and pedagogy students of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Content analysis was used to analyze students essays. Three categories were identified and characterized: “Perceptions of a person with limited health opportunities”, “Perceptions of oneself”, “Perceptions of the social environment”. Results. It has been established that the highest frequency is inherent in the category “Perceptions of a person with limited health opportunities”, which reflects well-formed representations of students about the personal qualities and psychological needs of people with disabilities. The ideas about the social environment of persons with disabilities, as well as about their own personality, were formed to a lesser extent. Conclusion. The obtained results allow us to draw general conclusions regarding the fragmentation of ideas about a person with limited health opportunities. The psychology students have the right ideas about the psychological resources needed by people with impaired development for successful social integration and partially correct ideas regarding the needs of this category of people. The obtained data reveal new information about the features of the formation of professional ideas in psychology students specializing in the psychological and pedagogical support of people with limited health opportunities.
Downloads
References
developmental disorders], 2010, no. 3, pp. 50–56. (in Russ).
2. Veretennikova A.E., Dobi E.B. [An argumentative essay as a means of assessing competencies]. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitelnykh organakh [Psychopedagogy in law enforcement], 2017, no. 1 (68), pp. 65–67. (in Russ).
3. Vershlovskiy S.G., Matyushkina M.D. Kontent-analiz v pedagogicheskom issledovanii [Content analysis in pedagogical research]. St. Petersburg, APPO, 2012. 56 p. (in Russ).
4. Volkova V.V., Mikhalchi E.V. [Study of the social stereotype and psychological portrait of a person with disabilities and disabilities through the eyes of students]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya [Theoretical and experimental psychology], 2016, no. 2, pp. 31–42. (in Russ).
5. Grebennikova E.V., Zakotnova E.Yu. [Psychological readiness of students-psychologists for professional activity in the conditions of inclusive education]. Vestnik TGPU [Bulletin of TGPU], 2015, no. 3 (156), pp. 34–37. (in Russ).
6. Dolinskaya V.V., Slesarev V.L. [Practice-oriented education: problems and solutions]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina [Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafin], 2016, no. 10 (26), pp. 6–17. (in Russ).
7. Zhukova V.F. [Psychological and pedagogical analysis of the category of “psychological readiness”]. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta [News of Tomsk Polytechnic University], 2012, no. 6, pp. 117–121. (in Russ).
8. Kupershlag I.G. [Reflective essay as a means of developing a professional self-concept of a future teacher]. Vestnik TGPU [Bulletin of TGPU], 2016, no. 5 (170), pp. 74–77. (in Russ).
9. Kurilovich V.K., Chernova E.A. [Formation of the readiness of teachers to work with children with disabilities and children with disabilities]. Uchenye zapiski ZabGU. Ser. Pedagogicheskie nauki [Scientific notes ZabSU. Ser. Pedagogical sciences], 2018, no. 6, pp. 136–143. (in Russ).
10. Malakhova T. V. [Features of the emotional attitude of parents to preschoolers with mental retardation]. Mezhdunarodnyy studencheskiy nauchnyy vestnik [International Student Science Bulletin], 2018, no. 2, pp. 176–187. (in Russ).
11. Manukyan V.R. [Psychological content and factors of the crisis of professional development among university students]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2011, no. 4, pp. 109–117. (in Russ).
12. Rozhdestvenskaya N.A., Razumova A.V. [Inharmonious styles of family education and parental perception of their children]. Vestnik MGU. Ser. 14 Psikhologiya [Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser. 14 Psychology], 2002, no. 2, p. 48. (in Russ).
13. Fominykh E.S. [Psychological resources of persons with disabilities as a factor of inclusion in society]. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal “Kontsept” [Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Concept”], 2016, Vol. 20, pp. 86–92. http://e-koncept.ru/2016/56332.htm (accessed 18.06.2019). (in Russ).
14. Shabanova O. P., Shabanova M. N. [Practice-oriented teacher training as a strategy of Russian education]. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scientists notes. Electronic scientific journal of Kursk State University], 2015, no. 1 (33), pp. 123–127. http://scientific-notes.ru/#new-number?id=38 (дата обращения: 18.06.2019). (in Russ).
15. Levitt J.M. Developing a model of disability that focuses on the actions of disabled people. Disability & Society, 2017, vol. 32, pp. 735–747.
16. Fisher K.R. Policies to change attitudes to people with disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 2017, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 161–174.
References on translit
-
Copyright (c) 2020 Psychology. Psychophysiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
