BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS OF OPTIMAL RESILIENCE IN EXTREME CONDITIONS

Kotovskaya S.

doi:10.14529/jpps210103

S. V. Kotovskaya Moscow State University of Humanities and Economics (49, Losinoostrovskaya str., Moscow, 107150, Russia) http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-2702 s.marunyak74@mail.ru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps210103

Keywords: resilience, psychophysiological factors, psychological factors, social factors, biopsychosocial approach

Abstract

Abstract. Maintaining high skilled specialists will allow solving the problems of both expertize and employment. Moreover, defining age and personal limits in every profession is becoming a key issue in labor, health and education psychology. This determines the importance of building and maintaining resilience at workplace. This paper aims to establish the biopsychosocial factors that determine the optimal level of resilience in extreme conditions. Materials and methods. Military personnel (n = 431) with an optimal level of resilience in extreme conditions participated in the study. The following methods were used for empirical research: professional resilience test; the Luscher color test interpreted by I. Tsyganok; simple and complex visual and motor reaction; K. Leonhard accentuated personality system; mini-cartoon technique; interpersonal relationships measurement system, and the author's social questionnaire. Results. As a result of empirical research, it was found that the optimal level of resilience consisted of 5 factors: socialization, satisfaction, self-regulation, self-realization and activity. Socialization is a fundamental factor in the structure of resilience. Successful functioning in society determines the formation of satisfaction, which contributes to the mobilization of resources, self-regulation and self-realization. Self-realization allows to be active. Psychophysiological and psychological characteristics of experts working in extreme conditions, as well as the features of their social development form certain factors that constitute internal conditions for the subsequent transformation of their personality under the external influence of professional loads.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

S. V. Kotovskaya , Moscow State University of Humanities and Economics (49, Losinoostrovskaya str., Moscow, 107150, Russia)

Associate Professor, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology

References

1. Butorina O.S., Rylskaya E.A. Resiliency in the structure of professional and personal potential of the Manager. Organizatsionnaya psihologiya I psihologiya tryda = Institute of psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational psychology and labor psychology. 2017: 4 (2); 134–151. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30794470 (in Russ.).
2. Bonkalo T.N., Kotovskaya S.V. An emergent synergetic approach to the professional activity subjects' resilience development process study. Aktyalnye proplemy psihologicheskogo znaniya = Actual problems of psychological knowledge. 2019; 2 (51): 5–18. (in Russ.).
3. Makhnach A.V. Human resilience as research object in psychology. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological journal. 2017; 38 (4): 5–16. DOI: 10.7868/S0205959217040018 (in Russ.).
4. Makhnach A.V. Theoretical foundations and prospects of interdisciplinary studies of professional viability. Current state and prospects of development of labor psychology and organizational psychology. Мoscow. IP RAS. 2018: 639–654. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36389744 (in Russ.).
5. Laktionova A.I. Dependence of Human Resilience on the Features of Temperament and Control of Behavior. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2019; 12 (4); 24– 33. DOI: 10.14529/jpps190403 (in Russ.).
6. Engel G.L. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977; 196 (4286): 129–136. DOI: 10.1126/science.847460
7. Borrell-Carrió F., Suchman A.L., Epstein R.M. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2 (6): 576–582. DOI: 10.1370/AFM.245
8. Frolova Yu.G. Biopsychosocial model as a conceptual basis of health psychology. Filosofiya i sotsial'nye nauki = Philosophy and Social Sciences. 2008; 4: 60–65. (in Russ.).
9. Kondratev G.V., Yudin S.A., Vershinin E.G. et al. Biopsychosocial approach in medicine: the theory and its practical realization. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Advances in modern natural science. 2014; 9(1): 14–16
10. Taratukhin E.O. Biopsychosocial approach – a modern demand for interdisciplinarity. Rossiiskii kardiologicheskii zhurnal = Russian journal of cardiology. 2015; 20 (9): 80–83. DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2015-09-80-83 (in Russ.).https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21818142 (in Russ.).
11. Mazilov V.A., Ryl'skaya E.A. The viability of a person: methodological issues of the study. Yaroslavskii psikhologicheskii vestnik = Yaroslavl Psychological Bulletin. 2016; 36: 55–62. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30305704
12. Vasilieva S.N., Rylskaya E.A. Constructing the definition of the concept “Resilience of the professional” Yaroslavskii psikhologicheskii vestnik = Yaroslavl Psychological Bulletin. 2019; 2 (107): 106–113. DOI: 10.24411/1813-145X-2019-10358 (in Russ.).
13. Kotovskaya S.V., Mosyagin I.G. Correlation between the functional status and viability in the subjects involved in extreme activities. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2019; 12 (3): 64–71. DOI: 10.14529/jpps190306 (in Russ.).
Kotovskaya S.V. Psychophysiological factors of professional viability in extreme specialists from emergent synergetic perspective. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2020; 13 (1): 79–87. DOI: 10.14529/jpps200109 (in Russ.).

References on translit

.