The structural model of a physician's communicative competence

Keywords: physician’s communicative competence, structural model, cognitive-behavioral component, emotional-reflexive component, ethical-deontological component, therapeutic alliance, commitment to treatment, professional communication in medicine, empathy

Abstract

Background. In scientific literature, a physician’s communicative competence is considered a complex, multi-component phenomenon that integrates knowledge, skills, and personal qualities. The analysis of various theoretical approaches reveals a lack of a unified, integrative model that accounts for the specifics of medical practice and the role of model components in achieving a therapeutic alliance. Aims. This study aims to develop a structural model of communicative competence based on a synthesis of contemporary Russian and international research. Theoretical foundations. This study consists of complementary approaches: descriptive analysis was used to systematize the characteristics of the phenomenon; an integrative approach, to conceptualize the phenomenon as a multi-component construct; and subject-activity and competence-based approaches, to analyze the phenomenon within the context of professional activity. Categorization methods were employed to identify structural elements and to facilitate a critical analysis of theoretical propositions and empirical data. Results. As a result of this research, a three-component model of a physician’s communicative competence has been developed, comprising cognitive-behavioral, emotional-reflexive, and ethical-deontological components. The model demonstrates a synergetic relationship among these components: operational skills are regulated by psychological mechanisms of self-awareness and guided by a system of professional values. A key finding is the differentiation of empathy types, which confirms the primacy of cognitive empathy and compassion in patients' assessment of care quality and clarifies the context-dependent role of reflection. Conclusion. The developed model offers a framework for modernizing educational programs and designing targeted training aimed at the holistic development of communicative competence in medical professionals. Prospects for further research involve the empirical validation of the model and an investigation into how its components vary according to medical specialization and the physician’s experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Y. S. Filatova , Yaroslavl State Medical University (5 Revolutsionnaya str., Yaroslavl, 150000, Russia)

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Psychology

N. B. Lutova , V.M. Bekhterev National Research Medical Center for Psychiatry and Neurology (3 Bekhtereva str., St. Petersburg, 192019, Russia)

Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Integrative Pharmaco-Psychotherapy for Patients with Mental Disorders

References

1. Burtovaya N.B. Professional and communicative competence of a university teacher. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University. 2012;6(121):180–182. (in Russ.).
2. Kashnitskiy V.I. Personality communication as a subject of scientific study. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika = Bulletin of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2008;4:131–137 (in Russ.).
3. Kashapov M.M., Kiseleva T.G., Kotochigova E.V. Competence: concept, types, basic approaches to the diagnosis of a psychologists competence. Sotsialnyi psikholog = Social psychologist. 2003;1(5):39–44. (in Russ.).
4. Korolenko A.M. A study of the communicative competence of medical students. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena= Izvestiya RSPU named after A.I. Herzen. 2009;116:265–272. (in Russ.).
5. Gorshunova N.K., Medvedev N.V. Formation of the communicative competence of a modern doctor. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Successes of modern natural science. 2010;3:36–37. (in Russ.).
6. Chichirez C.M., Purcărea V.L. Interpersonal communication in healthcare. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2018;11(2):119–122.
7. Kiessling C, Fabry G. What is communicative competence and how can it be acquired? GMS Journal for Medical Education. 2021;38(3)49. DOI: 10.3205/zma001445
8. Hansen C., Guassora A.D., Arreskov A.B. et al. Relationally competent attitudes and actions: a systematic review of general practice literature. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2025;43(1):181–193. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2417169
9. Kashapov M.M., Bazanova G.Y. Comparison of indicators of metacognitive awareness of doctors at different stages of education. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya = Perspectives of science and education. 2021;4(52):392–403. (in Russ.).
10. Lerch S.P., Hänggi R., Bussmann Y., Lörwald A. A model of contributors to a trusting patient-physician relationship: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. BMC Primary Care. 2024;25(1):194. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02435-z.
11. Zhuravleva, E. A. Compliance (adherence to treatment): An analytical review of the content, models, diagnostic methods and correction techniques. Uchenye zapiski Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialnogo universiteta = Scientific Notes of the Russian State Social University. 2023;22(2):76–86. DOI: 10.17922/2071-5323-2023-22-2-76-86. (in Russ.).
12. Parker L., Ryan R., Young S., Hill S. Medications and doctor-patient communication. Australian journal of general practice. 2021;50(10):709–714. DOI: 10.31128/AJGP-05-21-5973
13. Frau E.D., Degabriel D., Luvini G. et al. Asking patients if they have any questions can help improve patient satisfaction with medical team communication in the emergency department. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2024;24(1):85. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01001-1.
14. Chang D.S., Chen W.L., Wang R. Impact of the bidirectional relationship between communication and cognitive efficacy on orthopedic patient adherence behavior. BMC Health Services Research. 2022;22(1):199. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07575-5
15. Pidshmorga, Yu. V. Gutova T. S. Active listening as a condition for achieving mutual understanding between a doctor and a patient. Obshchestvoznanie i sotsialnaya psikhologiya = Social studies and social psychology. 2023;2-3(46):26–29. (in Russ.).
16. Serafimovich I.V., Kashapov M.M., Poshekhonova Yu.V., Bazanova G.Yu. Socio-psychological aspects of professional training in healthcare: specifics of metacognitive processes. Problemy sotsialnoi gigieny, zdravookhraneniya i istorii meditsiny = Problems of social hygiene, healthcare and the history of medicine. 2021;29(6):1607–1612. (in Russ.).
17. Datkhuzheva Z.K., Stash O.Y. Empathy as a structural component of a doctors communicative competence. Vestnik nauki = Bulletin of Science. 2025;8(89)238–245. URL: vestnik-nauki.com/article/ 25452 (accessed: 12.09.2025) (in Russ.).
18. Pusa S., Baxter R., Andersson S. et al. Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations: An Integrative Systematic Review. Journal of Palliative Care. 2024;39(4):340–351. DOI: 10.1177/ 08258597241245022.
19. Bergenholtz H., Missel M., Timm H. Talking about death and dying in a hospital setting – a qualitative study of the wishes for end-of-life conversations from the perspective of patients and spouses. BMC Palliative Care. 2020;19(1):168.
20. Baguley S.I., Pavlova A., Consedine N.S. More than a feeling? What does compassion in healthcare look like to patients? Health expectations. 2022;25(4.):1691–1702. DOI:10.1111/hex.13512
21. Licciardone J.C., Tran Y., Ngo K. et al. Physician Empathy and Chronic Pain Outcomes. JAMA network open. 2024;7(4):e246026. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6026
22. Han C., Wu Q., Liu C., Wang P. Patients perceived empathy can predict doctor-patient relationship in medical interaction. BMC medical education. 2025;25(1):741. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-07117-7
23. Gerger H., Munder T., Kreuzer N. et al. Lay Perspectives on Empathy in Patient-Physician Communication: An Online Experimental Study. Health communication 2024;39(6):1246–1255. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2210380
24. Campos C.F.C., Olivo C.R., Martins M.A., Tempski P.Z. Physicians attention to patients communication cues can improve patient satisfaction with care and perception of physicians empathy. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2024;79:100377. DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100377
25. Bovina I.B. Empathy research: a critical analysis and new perspectives. Kulturno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural and historical psychology. 2020;16(1):88–95. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/chp . 2020160109
26. Amelchenko A.A. The relationship between the level of development of empathy and the level of development of personal reflection. Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika = Psychology and psychotechnics. 2020;4:103–110. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2020.4.3462
27. Manuylov G.V., Gorelova G.G., Rylskaya E.A. et al. Reflexive processes and social orientation of subjects at the stages of professionalization (on the example of preparation for medical activity). Obrazovanie i nauka = Education and Science. 2020;22(4):43–63. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-4-43-63
28. Molchanova L.N. Reflection as a mechanism of value-semantic regulation of the state of mental burnout in doctors. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika = Izvestiya the Saratov University. New series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy. 2012;12(1):64–68. (in Russ.).
29. Omelichkin O.V. moral qualities of a medical worker. Vestnik obshchestvennykh i gumanitarnykh nauk = Bulletin of Social and Humanitarian Sciences. 2022;3(2):21–30. (in Russ.).
30. Makartseva K.P., Simonyan R.Z. The problem of the growth of patient complaints against medical workers. Meditsinskoe pravo: teoriya i praktika = Medical law: theory and practice. 2023;9(3-4):119–125. (in Russ.).

References on translit

-
Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
Filatova, Y., & Lutova, N. (2025). The structural model of a physician’s communicative competence. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 18(4), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps250407
Section
Medical (clinical) psychology