Psychological characteristics of female patients of a cosmetology clinic: comparison with normative data

  • E. S. Bagnenko 1) St. Petersburg Beauty Institute “Galaktika” (5/2, Pirogovskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia); 2) Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University (6-8, Lev Tolstoy St., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russia) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-7005 e_bagnenko@mail.ru
Keywords: female patients, cosmetology clinic, normative sample, level of neuroticism, stress, coping, personality features

Abstract

Introduction. Psychological studies with patients of aesthetic clinics after minimally invasive surgery are scarce and contradictory with respect to the normative or maladaptive nature of personal characteristics, behavior, and emotional status. Aims: to identify the psychological characteristics of female patients in a cosmetology clinic and compare their psychodiagnostic evaluations with normative data obtained from a national normative population sample. Based on the available literature, special attention was paid to the prevalence of mental disorders among patients in cosmetology clinics. Neuroticism levels and subjectively perceived stress during aesthetic treatment are also to be studied. Materials and methods. The following methods were used: the Level of Neuroticism Test, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the Big Five Personality Test, the Ways of Coping Questionnaire, and the Purpose in Life Test. The results obtained were compared with normative ones in a sample of 180 female patients with facial skin problems (mean age 39.11 ± 0.8 years). Results. Significant differences were found between the results obtained in female patients and those considered normative ones for 19 out of 23 psychodiagnostic parameters. Female patients of a cosmetology clinic were less emotionally stable while having a wide range of coping strategies and the corresponding resources (mechanisms of psychological adaptation). Female patients were characterized by self-discipline, purposefulness, responsibility, desire for cooperation, conservatism of attitudes and interests, and pragmatism. Conclusion. Prospects for more differentiated psychological studies are outlined with respect to the clinical aspects of skin symptoms (nature, severity, duration etc).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

E. S. Bagnenko , 1) St. Petersburg Beauty Institute “Galaktika” (5/2, Pirogovskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 194044, Russia); 2) Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University (6-8, Lev Tolstoy St., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russia)

1) Candidate of Medical Sciences, dermatologist-cosmetologist; 2) Assistant of the Department of Plastic Surgery

References

1. Karavaeva T.A. Psychological mechanisms and psychosomatic relationships in various dermatoses. Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya = Clinical dermatology and venereology. 2018;17(5):7–17. (in Russ). DOI: 10.17116/klinderma2018170517.
2. Bagnenko E.S. The role of appearance in human social adaptation. Psihologiya. Psihofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology. 2021;14(3):105–113. (in Russ.).
3. Korotkova I., Klibson S., Gulordava M., Trąbczyński P. Clinical and psychological characteristics and targets for psychotherapy at atopic dermatitis patients. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. 2021;3:17–24. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.12740/APP/132537
4. Asimakopoulou E., Zavrides H., Askitis T. Plastic surgery on body image, body satisfaction and self-esteem. Acta chirurgiae plasticae. 2020;61(1-4):3–9.
5. Özkur E., Kıvanç Altunay İ., Aydın Ç. Psychopathology among individuals seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2020;7(4):939–945. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13101
6. Sobanko J.F., Taglienti A.J., Wilson A.J. et al. Motivations for seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures in an academic outpatient setting. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2015;35(8):1014–1020. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv094.
7. Hamilton H.K., Lilly E., Arndt K.A. et al. No difference in psychotropic medication use in cosmetic and general dermatology patients. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. 2016;15(7):858–861.
8. Sarwer D.B. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments. Body Image. 2019;31:302–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009
9. Wang Q., Cao C., Guo R. et al. Avoiding psychological pitfalls in aesthetic medical procedures. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2016;40(6):954–961. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-016-0715-9.
10. Pikoos T.D., Rossell S.L., Tzimas N. et al. Assessing unrealistic expectations in clients undertaking minor cosmetic procedures: the development of the Aesthetic Procedure Expectations Scale. Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2021;23(4):263–269. DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0247.
11. Scharschmidt D., Mirastschijski U., Preiss S. et al. Body image, personality traits, and quality of life in Botulinum Toxin A and dermal filler patients. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2018;42(4):1119–1125. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-018-1165-3.
12. Bagnenko E.S., Aravijskaja E.R., Bogatenkov A.I., Bagnenko S.S. The relationship between the clinical and psychological characteristics of women seeking cosmetological help. Vestnik dermatologii I venerologii = Bulletin of dermatology and veneriology. 2021;97(5):66–75. (in Russ.).
13. Bagnenko E.S. Psychosocial characteristics of female patients of a cofmetological clinic: results of the study on continuous alignment. Obozrenie psihiatrii I medicinskoj psihologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva = Review of psychiatry and medical psychology named after V.M. Bekhterev. 2023;57(1):48–60.
(in Russ.). DOI: 10.31363/2313-7053-2023-658.
14. Karpova E.B., Iovlev E.B., Vuks A.Ya. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika urovnya nevrotizacii [Psikhological diagnostics of the level of neuroticism]. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika rasstrojstv emocionalnoi sferyi lichnosti [Psichological diagnostics of disorders of the emotional sphere of personality]. St. Petersburg, Skifija-print. 2014:154–170. (in Russ.).
15. Ababkov V.A., Barishnikova K., Vorontsova-Venger O.V., Gorbunov I.A., Kapranova S.V., Pologaeva E.A., Stuklov E.A. Validation of the Russian version of the “Scale of perceived stress”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Serija 16. Psihologiya. Pedagogika = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology.Pedagogy. 2016;2:6–15. (in Russ.).
16. Vasserman L.I., Ababkov V.A., Trifonova E.A. Sovladanie so stressom: teoriya I psikhodiagnostika [Coping with stress: theory and psychodiagnostics]. St. Petersburg, Rech. 2010:192. (in Russ.).
17. Leontev D.A. Test smyslozhiznennykh orientatsiy [Test sense-making of orientation]. Moscow, Smysl. 2006:18. (in Russ.).
18. Iovlev B.V., Karpova E.B., Vuks A.Ya. Shkala dlya psikhologicheskoi ekspress-diagnostiki urovnya nevrotizatsii [Scale for psychological express-diagnostics of the level of neutoticism]. Ed. L.I. Vasserman. St. Petersburg, Psikhonevrologicheskiy institute im.V.M. Bekhtereva. 1999:34. (in Russ.).
19. Shindrikov R.Yu., Schelkova O.Yu., Demchenko E.A., Milanich Yu.M. Coping behavior in the psychosocial assessment system of patients awaiting heart transplantation. Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Advisory psychology and psychotherapy. 2020:28(2):170–190. (in Russ.).
20. Vasserman L.I., SchelkovaO.Yu., Dubinina E.A. et al. Social frustration as a factor in psychogenesis of mental adjustment disorder. Obozrenie psikhiatrii I meditsinskoi psikhologii imeni V.M. Bekhtereva = Review of psychiatry and medical psychology named after V.M. Bekhterev. 2021;57(3):8–18.
21. Samuels D.V., Rosenthal R., Lin R. et al. Acne vulgaris and risk of depression and anxiety: a meta-analytic review. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2020;83(2):532–541. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.02.040.
22. Yew Y.W., Kuan A.H.Y., Ge L. et al. Psychosocial impact of skin diseases: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0244765. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0244765.
23. Stamu-OBrien C., Jafferany M., Carniciu S. et al. Psychodermatology of acne: psychological aspects and effects of acne vulgaris. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2021;20(4):1080–1083. DOI:10.1111/jocd.13765.
24. Xu S., Zhu Y., Hu H. et al. The analysis of acne increasing suicide risk. Medicine. 2021;100(24):e26035. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000026035.
25. Sachdeva M., Tan J., Lim J. et al. The prevalence, risk factors, and psychosocial impacts of acne vulgaris in medical students: a literature review. International Journal of Dermatology. 2021;60(7):792–798. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.15280.
26. Zhang Q., Wu W., Fan Y. et al. The safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A on the treatment of depression. Brain and Behavior. 2021;11(9):e2333. DOI:10.1002/brb3.2333.
27. Huang Y., Yan S., Xie H. et al. Health related quality of life of rosacea patients in China assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index and willingness to pay. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2022;16:659–670. DOI:10.2147/PPA.S345258.
28. Yang T.T., Lan C.E. Impacts of skin disorders associated with facial discoloration on quality of life: novel insights explaining discordance between life quality scores and willingness to pay. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2022;21(7):3053–3058. DOI:10.1111/jocd.14546.
29. Chernyshov P.V., Finlay A.Y., Tomas-Aragones L. et al. Quality of life measurement in rosacea. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa. European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2023;37(5):954–964. DOI:10.1111/jdv.18918.
30. Leidger A., Vosschulte M., Nieder T.O. et al. Sexual self-esteem and psychological burden of adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:883019. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883019.
31. Shetche K. From coping strategies to symptoms of psychopathology: structural equation modelling confirming the importance of social support. Konsultativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Consultative psychology and psychotherapy. 2022;30(1):67–92. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2022300105
32. Kochurov M.G. Connection between coping strategies and locus of control. Mezhdunarodniy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal. Psikhologicheskie nauki = Interenational Scientific Research Journal. Psychological Sciences. 2020;1-2:40–43. (in Russ.).
33. Ksenofontova E.G., Zabegalina S.V. Korzhova E.Yu. Lokus kontrol – bolee poluveka issledovaniy [Locus of control – over half a century of research]. Moscow, Prospekt. 2021:112. (in Russ.).
34. Sats E.A., Slobodchikov I.M. Peculiarities of self-awareness of female clients of cosmetology services. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern problems of science and education. 2015;1-1. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=18589 (accessed: 27.07.2023).
(in Russ.).
35. Dobosz M., Rogowska P., Sokołowska E. et al. Motivations, demography, and clinical features of body dysmorphic disorder among people seeking cosmetic treatments: a study of 199 patients. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2022;21(10):4646–4650. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14890.

References on translit

-
Published
2023-12-31
How to Cite
Bagnenko, E. (2023). Psychological characteristics of female patients of a cosmetology clinic: comparison with normative data. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 16(4), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps230403
Section
Medical (clinical) psychology