Neuropsychological and psychosomatic correlates of arterial hypertension in patients with interhemispheric functional asymmetry
Abstract
Aims. This study aims to evaluate the effect of interhemispheric interaction on the clinical and dynamic characteristics of arterial hypertension (AH) through the lens of psychosomatic balancing for developing new prognostic criteria for disease progression. Materials and methods. This cross-sectional study involved 60 patients diagnosed with stage I–II AH (mean age 59.7 ± 10.6 years; 73.2 % female patients). The diagnostic protocol included lateral profile assessment (Zaitsev test), handgrip dynamometry as a measure of motor asymmetry, and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. Psychosomatic status was evaluated using the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) and the SF-36 health survey. Adaptation capacity was evaluated by measuring the time required for oxygen saturation recovery after standardized physical exercise. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Results. Deficiency of interhemispheric interaction mechanisms proved to be a statistically significant predictor of a more severe course of arterial hypertension. A strong inverse correlation was found between the effectiveness of interhemispheric transfer and systolic blood pressure. Patients with insufficient interhemispheric interaction demonstrated an imbalanced adaptation pattern: a twofold dominance of immature defense systems (primarily somatization, repression, and denial) accompanied by reduced quality of life in the mental health domain. Physiological rigidity in this population was confirmed by a significant slowing of post-exercise oxygen saturation recovery, indicating inertia of autonomic control and associated with a high risk of hypertensive crises. Conclusion. Weak interhemispheric interaction limits the adaptive potential of the central nervous system, impedes full cognitive representation of affect, and promotes its somatization through increased vascular tone. The obtained results justify the integration of neuropsychological correction and biofeedback into comprehensive rehabilitation programs for patients with arterial hypertension to optimize psychosomatic balance
Downloads
References
2. Berezin F.B. Psikhicheskaya i psikhosomaticheskaya adaptatsiya [Mental and Psychosomatic Adaptation]. Moscow. Kogito-Tsentr Publ. 2014:304. (in Russ.)
3. Shmidt E.I. The role of cortical-subcortical relationships in the pathogenesis of arterial hypertension. Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2015;115(4):12–18. (in Russ.).
4. Sudakov K.V. Psychoemotional stress: prevention and rehabilitation. Terapevticheskii arhiv = Therapeutic Archive, 2017;89(1): 4–10. (in Russ.).
5. Ginty A.T., Williams S.E. Cardiovascular responses to acute psychological stress and future blood pressure. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2025;87(1):12–21. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001245
6. Bragina N.N., Dobrokhotova T.A. Funktsionalnye asimmetrii cheloveka [Functional Asymmetries in Man]. Moscow. Meditsina Publ. 1988:240. (in Russ.).
7. Leutin V.P., Nikolaeva E.I. Funktsionalnaya asimmetriya mozga: adaptatsiya i rezistentnost [Functional Brain Asymmetry: Adaptation and Resistance]. St. Petersburg. Rech Publ. 2008:366. (in Russ.).
8. Chernigovskaya T.V. Cheshirskaya ulybka kota Shredingera: yazyk i soznanie [Schrödingers Cats Cheshire Smile: Language and Consciousness]. Moscow. Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury Publ. 2013:448. (in Russ.).
9. Wang L., Chen X. Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity as a Predictor of Stress-Induced Blood Pressure Variability. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2024;18:1345678. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1345678
10. Thayer J.F., Lane R.D. Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: Further elaboration of the neurovisceral integration model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022;132:110–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.11.025
11. Smith J., Brown A. Central Autonomic Network dysfunction in essential hypertension. Hypertension Research. 2023;46:215–224. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-01050-x
12. Mather M., Thayer J.F. How heart rate variability affects the brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2023;50:101–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101254
13. Craig A.D. Interoception and the right hemisphere dominance for health and homeostasis. Cognitive Neuroscience. 2023;14(2):88–104. DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2023.2185672
14. Uddin L.Q. Salience network and autonomic dysregulation in cardiovascular disease. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2023;27(4):350–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.01.005
15. Reverchuk I.V. Psychosomatic balance: neurodynamic aspects. Byulleten sibirskoi mediciny = Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2019;18(3):210–218. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.20538/1682-0363-2019-3-210-218
16. Moskvin V.A., Moskvina N.V. Mezhpolusharnye asimmetrii i individualnyi razlichiya cheloveka [Interhemispheric Asymmetries and Individual Differences in Humans]. Moscow. Smysl Publ. 2011:368 (in Russ.).
17. Critchley H.D., Garfinkel S.N. Interoception and autonomic control in psychosomatic disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2024;25:156–172. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-024-00891-w
18. Friston K.J. The connectome-based modeling of stress-induced vascular pathologies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2024;402:109988. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.109988
19. Verkuil B. The cardiovascular effects of prolonged stress and worrying. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2022;176:45–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.03.004
20. Forrester G.S., Hopkins W.D. Cerebral lateralization and brain plasticity: new perspectives. Brain Structure and Function. 2023;228:1–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-022-02586-y
21. Zhang Y., Li J. Biofeedback and neuropsychological correction in the management of resistant hypertension. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2024;178:111–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111654
22. Smith J., Brown A., Taylor R. Cerebral Lateralization and Autonomic Control: New Insights into Psychosomatic Mechanisms of Hypertension. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2023;165:111–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111118
23. Wang L., Chen X., Zhang Y. Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity as a Predictor of Stress-Induced Blood Pressure Variability. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2024;18:1345678. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1345678
References on translit
-Copyright (c) 2026 Psychology. Psychophysiology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

