РОЛЬ ВНЕШНОСТИ В СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ АДАПТАЦИИ ЧЕЛОВЕКА
Ключевые слова:
привлекательная внешность, влияние на межличностные отношения, психологические и биологические факторы, социальная адаптация
Аннотация
Аннотация. В нашем воспитании традиционны установки, что в межличностных отношениях ключевую роль играет внутренний мир человека, при этом его внешность имеет некое несущественное значение или вовсе его не имеет. Целью работы являлось изучение данных специальной литературы по вопросу влияния внешности человека на его адаптацию в обществе. Результаты. Исследования психологов и других специалистов, рассматриваемые в приводимом обзоре литературы, убеждают в том, что внешность человека играет существенную роль в его социальной адаптации, и эта роль в значительной степени определяется биологическими факторами, действующими не только в сообществах животных и влияющими в них на половой отбор, но и в человеческой среде.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока не доступны.
Литература
1. Marshall C.D., Hu M.S., Leavit T. et al. Cutaneous scarring: basic science, current treatments, and future directions // Advances in Wound Care. 2018. Vol. 7 (2). P. 29–45. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2016.0696.
2. Rumsey N., Harcourt D. The psychology of appearance. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press. 2005. 256 p.
3. Sarwer D.B. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments // Body Image. 2019. Vol. 31. P. 302–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009.
4. Куликов Л.В. Эмоциональная устойчивость личности. СПб.: Факультет психологии СПбГУ, 2008. 41 с.
5. Carrard I., Argyrides M., Ioannou X. et al. Associations between body dissatisfaction, importance of appearance, and aging anxiety with depression, and appearance-related behaviors in women in midlife // Journal of Women and Aging. 2019. Vol. 21. P. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2019.1681882.
6. Либина А. Психология современной женщины. М.: Эксмо, 2003. 816 с.
7. Изард К. Психология эмоций. СПб.: Питер, 2006. 464 с.
8. Яременко С.Н. Внешность человека в культуре. Ростов н/Д.: Издательский центр ДГТУ, 1997. 172 с.
9. Hashim P.W., Nia J.K., Taliercio M. et al. Ideals of facial beauty // Cutis. 2017. Vol. 100 (4). P. 222–224.
10. Swami V., Weis L., Barron D. et al. Positive body image is positively associated with hedonic (emotional) and eudaimonic (psychological and social) well-being in British adults // The Journal of Social Psychology. 2018. Vol. 158 (5). P. 541–552. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1392278.
11. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7, № 8. e42593. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
12. Halsey L.G., Huber J.W., Bufton R.D.J. et al. An explanation for enhanced perceptions of attractiveness after alcohol consumption // Alcohol. 2010. № 44 (4). P. 307–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.02.001.
13. Bowdring M.A., Sayette M.A. Perception of physical attractiveness when consuming and not consuming alcohol: a meta-analysis // Addiction. 2018. Vol. 16. DOI: 10.1111/add.14227. 29660184.
14. DeBrune L.M., Jones B.C., Perett D.I. Womens attractiveness of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle // Hormones and Behavior. 2005. Vol. 47. № 4. P. 379–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006.
15. Jones B.C., Hahn A.C., DeBruine L.M. Ovulation, sex hormones, and womens mating psychology // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2019. Vol. 23. № 1. Р. 51–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.008.
16. Zhu Q., Kou H., Bi T.Y. Processing mechanism of social cues in faces // Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2019. Vol. 71. № 1. P. 73–85.
17. Peterson R.D., Palmer C.L. Effects of physical attractiveness of political beliefs // Politics and the Life Sciences. 2017. Vol. 36. № 2. P. 3–16. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2017.18.
18. Kranz D., Nadarevic L., Erdfelder E. Bald and bad? Experimental evidence for a dual-process account of baldness stereotyping // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2019. Vol. 66 (5). P. 340–354. DOI: 10.1027/1618–3169/a000457.
19. Cash T.F., Kilcullen R.N. The aye of the beholder: susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1985. Vol. 15. P. 591–605. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.1985.tb00903.x
20. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J. et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review // Psychological Bulletin. 2000. Vol. 126 (3). P. 390–423. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.126.3.390.
21. Maestripieri D., Henry A., Nickels N. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017. Vol. 40. e19. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X160000340.
22. Sigall H. Beautiful but dangerous: effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridical judgment // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975. Vol. 31. P. 410–414. DOI:10.1037/h0076472.
23. Zaidel D.W., Bava S., Reis V.A. Relationship between facial asymmetry and judging trustworthiness in faces // Laterality. 2003. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 225–232. DOI: 10.1080/13576500244000120.
24. Schein S.S., Langlois J.H. Unattractive infant faces elicit negative affect from adults // Infant Behavior and Development. 2015. Vol. 38. P. 130–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.009.
25. Фромм Э. Человек для себя. Революция надежды. Иметь или быть. М.: АСТ, 2007. 602 с.
26. Guest E., Costa B., Williamson H. et al. The effectiveness of interventions aiming to promote positive body image in adults: a systematic review // Body Image. 2019. Vol. 30. P. 10–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.04.002.
27. Багненко Е.С. Система значимых отношений женщин, обращающихся за косметологической помощью // Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии им. В.М. Бехтерева. 2012. № 3. С. 42–47.
28. Balkrishnan R., McMichael A.J, Hu J.Y. et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes // International Journal of Dermatology. 2006. Vol. 45 (2). P. 111–115.
29. Sadick N.S. The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life // Dermatology Online Journal. 2008. Vol. 14 (8). P. 2.
30. Asimakopoulou E., Zavrides H., Askitis T. Plastic surgery on body image, body satisfaction and self-esteem // Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae. 2020. Vol. 61(1–4). P. 3–9.
31. Little A.C., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2011. Vol. 366 (1571). P. 1638–1659. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.
32. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals // Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018. Vol. 34(5). P. 458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
33. Петленко В.П. Основные методологические проблемы теории медицины. Л.: Медицина, 1982. 256 с.
34. Эспинас А.В. Социальная жизнь животных: опыт сравнительной психологии. М.: ЛИБРОКОМ, 2012. 319 с.
35. Samson N., Fink B., Matts P.J. Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance // International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2010. Vol. 32 (3). P. 167–184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2494.2009.00535.x.
36. Brierley M.E., Brooks K.R., Mond J. et al. The body and the beautiful: health, asttractiveness and body composition in mens and womens bodies // PLos One. 2016. Vol. 11 (6). e0156722. DOI: 0.1371/journal.pone.0156722.
37. Weeden J., Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review // Psychological Bulletin. 2005. Vol. 131 (5). P. 635–653. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.131.5.635.
38. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals // Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018. Vol. 34(5). P. 458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
39. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty // Annual Review of Psychology. 2006. Vol. 57. P. 199–226. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
40. Milutinovic J., Zelic K., Nedeljkovoc N. Evaluation of facial beauty using antropometric proportions // The Scientific World Journal. 2014. Vol. 20. 428250. DOI: 10.1155/2014/428250.
41. Fisher M.L., Voracek M. The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness // Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2006. Vol. 5(2). P. 190–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473–2165.2006.00249.x.
42. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7 (8). e42593. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
43. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness // Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2003. Vol. 26. № 3. Suppl. Р. 45–48.
44. Lephart E.D. A review of the role of estrogen in dermal aging and facial attractiveness in women // Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2018. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 282–288. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12508
45. Lephart E.D. Human scalp hair: modulation by various factors and hormones do estrogens inhibit or stimulate: a perplexing perspective // Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2019. Vol. 18. № 6. P. 1860–1865. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12888
46. Whitehead R.D., Ozakinci G., Perrett D.I. Attractive skin coloration: harnessing sexual selection to improve diet and health // Evolutionary Psychology. 2012. Vol. 10 (5). P. 842–854.
47. Dion K.K. Young childrens stereotyping of facial attractiveness // Developmental Psychology. 1973. Vol. 9. P. 183–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.007.
48. Jacobson A.S., Trivers R., Palestis B.G. Number of friends and self-perception among Jamaican children: the role of attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry // Journal of Biosocial Science. 2020. Vol. 52 (2). P. 184–197. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932019000373.
49. Langlois J.H., Ritter J.M., Roggman L.A. et al. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces // Developmental Psychology. 1991. Vol. 27. P. 79–84. DOI:10.1037/0012–1649.27.1.79
50. Ngaage M., Agius M. The psychology of scars: a mini-review // Psychiatria Danubina. 2018. Vol. 30. Suppl. 7. P. 633–638.
51. Šitum M., Kolić M., Buljan M. Psychodermatology // Acta Medica Croatica. 2016. Vol. 70. Suppl. 1. P. 35–38
52. Zaidel D.W. Neuroesthetics is not just about art // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. P. 80. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00080
53. Swami V., Laughton R., Grover S. et al. Asexuality is inversely associated with positive
body image in British adults // Heliyon. 2019. Vol. 5 (9). e02452. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02452.
54. Valentova J.V., Kleisner K., Havlíček J. et al. Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men // Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014. Vol. 43 (2). P. 353–361. DOI: 10.1007/s10508–013–0194–x.
55. Sorokowska A. Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli // Personality and Individual Differences. 2013. Vol. 55. P. 175–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.026.
56. Lundström J.N., Olsson M.J. Functional neuronal processing of human body odors // Vitamins and Hormones. 2010. Vol. 83. P. 1–23. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83001–8.
57. Sergeant M.J. Female perception of male body odor // Vitamins and Hormones. 2010. Vol. 83. P. 25–45. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83002–X.
58. Valentova J.V., Varella M.A., Havlíček J. et al. Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: a cross-cultural study // Behavioural Processes. 2017. Vol. 135. P. 95–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.005.
59. Walter K.V., Conroy-Beam D., Buss D.M. et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a largescale replication // Psychological Science. 2020. Vol. 31 (4). P. 408–423. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620904154.
2. Rumsey N., Harcourt D. The psychology of appearance. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press. 2005:256.
3. Sarwer D.B. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments. Body Image. 2019; 31:302–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009.
4. Kulikov L.V. Emotsionalnaya ustoichivost lichnosti [Emotional stability of personality]. St. Petersburg: Faculty of Psychology of St. Petersburg State University, 2008:41. (in Russ.).
5. Carrard I., Argyrides M., Ioannou X. et al. Associations between body dissatisfaction, importance of appearance, and aging anxiety with depression, and appearance-related behaviors in women in mid-life. Journal of Women and Aging. 2019; 21:1–14. DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2019.1681882.
6. Libina A. Psikhologiya sovremennoi zhenshchiny [Psychology of a modern woman]. Moscow: Eksmo, 2003:816. (in Russ.).
7. Izard K. Psikhologiya emotsii [Psychology of emotions]. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2006:464. (in Russ.).
8. Yaremenko S.N. Vneshnost cheloveka v kulture [The appearance of a person in culture]. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing Center of DSTU, 1997:172. (in Russ.).
9. Hashim P.W., Nia J.K., Taliercio M. et al. Ideals of facial beauty. Cutis. 2017; 100(4):222–224.
10. Swami V., Weis L., Barron D. et al. Positive body image is positively associated with hedonic (emotional) and eudaimonic (psychological and social) well-being in British adults. The Journal of Social Psychology. 2018; 158(5):541–552. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1392278.
11. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42593. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
12. Halsey L.G., Huber J.W., Bufton R.D.J. et al. An explanation for enhanced perceptions of attractiveness after alcohol consumption. Alcohol. 2010; 44(4):307–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.02.001.
13. Bowdring M.A., Sayette M.A. Perception of physical attractiveness when consuming and not consuming alcohol: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2018; 16. DOI: 10.1111/add.14227. 29660184.
14. DeBrune L.M., Jones B.C., Perett D.I. Womens attractiveness of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior. 2005; 47(4):379–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006.
15. Zhu Q., Kou H., Bi T.Y. Processing mechanism of social cues in faces. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2019; 71(1):73–85.
16. Peterson R.D., Palmer C.L. Effects of physical attractiveness of political beliefs. Politics and the Life Sciences. 2017; 36(2):3–16. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2017.18.
17. Kranz D., Nadarevic L., Erdfelder E. Bald and bad? Experimental evidence for a dual-process account of baldness stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2019; 66 (5):340–354. DOI: 10.1027/1618–3169/a000457.
18. Cash T.F., Kilcullen R.N. The aye of the beholder: susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1985; 15:591–605. DOI:10.1111/j.1559–1816.1985.tb00903.x
19. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J. et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. 2000; 126 (3):390–423. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.126.3.390.
20. Maestripieri D., Henry A., Nickels N. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017; 40. e19. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X160000340.
21. Sigall H. Beautiful but dangerous: effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridical judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975; 31:410–414. DOI:10.1037/h0076472.
22. Zaidel D.W., Bava S., Reis V.A. Relationship between facial asymmetry and judging trustworthiness in faces. Laterality. 2003; 8(3):225–232. DOI: 10.1080/13576500244000120.
23. .Schein S.S., Langlois J.H. Unattractive infant faces elicit negative affect from adults. Infant Behavior and Development. 2015; 38:130–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.009.
24. Fromm E. Chelovek dlya sebya. Revolyutsiya nadezhdy. Imet ili byt [A man for himself. The revolution of hope. To have or to be]. Moscow: AST, 2007:602.
25. Guest E., Costa B., Williamson H. et al. The effectiveness of interventions aiming to promote positive body image in adults: a systematic review. Body Image. 2019; 30:10–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.04.002.
26. Bagnenko E.S. [The system of significant relationships of women seeking cosmetological help]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva = Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology named after V.M. Bekhterev. 2012; 3:42–47.
27. Balkrishnan R., McMichael A.J, Hu J.Y. et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes. International Journal of Dermatology. 2006; 45(2):111–115.
28. Sadick N.S. The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life. Dermatology Online Journal. 2008; 14 (8):2.
29. Asimakopoulou E., Zavrides H., Askitis T. Plastic surgery on body image, body satisfaction and self-esteem. Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae. 2020; 61(1–4):3–9.
30. Little A.C., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2011; 366(1571):1638–1659. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.
31. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018; 34(5):458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
32. Petlenko V.P. Osnovnye metodologicheskie problemy teorii meditsiny [Basic methodological problems of the theory of medicine]. Leningrad: Medicine, 1982:256.
33. Espinas A.V. Sotsialnaya zhizn zhivotnykh: opyt sravnitelnoi psikhologii [The social life of animals: the experience of comparative psychology]. Moscow: LIBROCOM, 2012:319.
34. Samson N., Fink B., Matts P.J. Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2010; 32(3):167–184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2494.2009.00535.x.
35. Samson N., Fink B., Matts P.J. Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2010; 32(3):167–184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2494.2009.00535.x.
36. Brierley M.E., Brooks K.R., Mond J. et al. The body and the beautiful: health, asttractiveness and body composition in mens and womens bodies. PLos One. 2016; 11(6):e0156722. DOI: 0.1371/journal.pone.0156722.
37. Weeden J., Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. Psychological Bulletin. 2005; 131(5):635–653. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.131.5.635.
38. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018; 34(5):458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
39. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006; 57:199–226. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
40. Milutinovic J., Zelic K., Nedeljkovoc N. Evaluation of facial beauty using antropometric proportions. The Scientific World Journal. 2014; 20:428250. DOI:10.1155/2014/428250.
41. Fisher M.L., Voracek M. The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2006; 5(2):190–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473–2165.2006.00249.x.
42. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42593. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
43. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2003; 26(3):45–48.
44. Lephart E.D. A review of the role of estrogen in dermal aging and facial attractiveness in women. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2018; 17(3):282–288. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12508
45. Lephart E.D. Human scalp hair: modulation by various factors and hormones do estrogens inhibit or stimulate: a perplexing perspective. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2019; 18(6):1860–1865. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12888
46. Whitehead R.D., Ozakinci G., Perrett D.I. Attractive skin coloration: harnessing sexual selection to improve diet and health. Evolutionary Psychology. 2012; 10(5):842–854.
47. Dion K.K. Young childrens stereotyping of facial attractiveness. Developmental Psychology. 1973; 9:183–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.007.
48. Jacobson A.S., Trivers R., Palestis B.G. Number of friends and self-perception among Jamaican children: the role of attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2020; 52(2):184–197. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932019000373.
49. Langlois J.H., Ritter J.M., Roggman L.A. et al. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology. 1991; 27:79–84. DOI:10.1037/0012–1649.27.1.79
50. Ngaage M., Agius M. The psychology of scars: a mini-review. Psychiatria Danubina. 2018; 30(7):633–638.
51. Šitum M., Kolić M., Buljan M. Psychodermatology. Acta Medica Croatica. 2016; 70(1):35–38.
52. Zaidel D.W. Neuroesthetics is not just about art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015; 9:80. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00080
53. Swami V., Laughton R., Grover S. et al. Asexuality is inversely associated with positive body image in British adults. Heliyon. 2019; 5(9):e02452. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02452.
54. Valentova J.V., Kleisner K., Havlíček J. et al. Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014; 43(2):353–361. DOI: 10.1007/s10508–013–0194–x.
55. Sorokowska A. Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013; 55:175–179. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.026.
56. Lundström J.N., Olsson M.J. Functional neuronal processing of human body odors. Vitamins and Hormones. 2010; 83:1–23. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83001–8.
57. Sergeant M.J. Female perception of male body odor. Vitamins and Hormones. 2010; 83:25–45. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83002–X.
58. Valentova J.V., Varella M.A., Havlíček J. et al. Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: a cross-cultural study. Behavioural Processes. 2017; 135:95–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.005.
59. Walter K.V., Conroy–Beam D., Buss D.M. et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a large-scale replication. Psychological Science. 2020; 31(4):408–423. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620904154
2. Rumsey N., Harcourt D. The psychology of appearance. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press. 2005. 256 p.
3. Sarwer D.B. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments // Body Image. 2019. Vol. 31. P. 302–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009.
4. Куликов Л.В. Эмоциональная устойчивость личности. СПб.: Факультет психологии СПбГУ, 2008. 41 с.
5. Carrard I., Argyrides M., Ioannou X. et al. Associations between body dissatisfaction, importance of appearance, and aging anxiety with depression, and appearance-related behaviors in women in midlife // Journal of Women and Aging. 2019. Vol. 21. P. 1–14. DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2019.1681882.
6. Либина А. Психология современной женщины. М.: Эксмо, 2003. 816 с.
7. Изард К. Психология эмоций. СПб.: Питер, 2006. 464 с.
8. Яременко С.Н. Внешность человека в культуре. Ростов н/Д.: Издательский центр ДГТУ, 1997. 172 с.
9. Hashim P.W., Nia J.K., Taliercio M. et al. Ideals of facial beauty // Cutis. 2017. Vol. 100 (4). P. 222–224.
10. Swami V., Weis L., Barron D. et al. Positive body image is positively associated with hedonic (emotional) and eudaimonic (psychological and social) well-being in British adults // The Journal of Social Psychology. 2018. Vol. 158 (5). P. 541–552. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1392278.
11. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7, № 8. e42593. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
12. Halsey L.G., Huber J.W., Bufton R.D.J. et al. An explanation for enhanced perceptions of attractiveness after alcohol consumption // Alcohol. 2010. № 44 (4). P. 307–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.02.001.
13. Bowdring M.A., Sayette M.A. Perception of physical attractiveness when consuming and not consuming alcohol: a meta-analysis // Addiction. 2018. Vol. 16. DOI: 10.1111/add.14227. 29660184.
14. DeBrune L.M., Jones B.C., Perett D.I. Womens attractiveness of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle // Hormones and Behavior. 2005. Vol. 47. № 4. P. 379–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006.
15. Jones B.C., Hahn A.C., DeBruine L.M. Ovulation, sex hormones, and womens mating psychology // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2019. Vol. 23. № 1. Р. 51–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.008.
16. Zhu Q., Kou H., Bi T.Y. Processing mechanism of social cues in faces // Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2019. Vol. 71. № 1. P. 73–85.
17. Peterson R.D., Palmer C.L. Effects of physical attractiveness of political beliefs // Politics and the Life Sciences. 2017. Vol. 36. № 2. P. 3–16. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2017.18.
18. Kranz D., Nadarevic L., Erdfelder E. Bald and bad? Experimental evidence for a dual-process account of baldness stereotyping // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2019. Vol. 66 (5). P. 340–354. DOI: 10.1027/1618–3169/a000457.
19. Cash T.F., Kilcullen R.N. The aye of the beholder: susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1985. Vol. 15. P. 591–605. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559–1816.1985.tb00903.x
20. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J. et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review // Psychological Bulletin. 2000. Vol. 126 (3). P. 390–423. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.126.3.390.
21. Maestripieri D., Henry A., Nickels N. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017. Vol. 40. e19. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X160000340.
22. Sigall H. Beautiful but dangerous: effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridical judgment // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975. Vol. 31. P. 410–414. DOI:10.1037/h0076472.
23. Zaidel D.W., Bava S., Reis V.A. Relationship between facial asymmetry and judging trustworthiness in faces // Laterality. 2003. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 225–232. DOI: 10.1080/13576500244000120.
24. Schein S.S., Langlois J.H. Unattractive infant faces elicit negative affect from adults // Infant Behavior and Development. 2015. Vol. 38. P. 130–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.009.
25. Фромм Э. Человек для себя. Революция надежды. Иметь или быть. М.: АСТ, 2007. 602 с.
26. Guest E., Costa B., Williamson H. et al. The effectiveness of interventions aiming to promote positive body image in adults: a systematic review // Body Image. 2019. Vol. 30. P. 10–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.04.002.
27. Багненко Е.С. Система значимых отношений женщин, обращающихся за косметологической помощью // Обозрение психиатрии и медицинской психологии им. В.М. Бехтерева. 2012. № 3. С. 42–47.
28. Balkrishnan R., McMichael A.J, Hu J.Y. et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes // International Journal of Dermatology. 2006. Vol. 45 (2). P. 111–115.
29. Sadick N.S. The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life // Dermatology Online Journal. 2008. Vol. 14 (8). P. 2.
30. Asimakopoulou E., Zavrides H., Askitis T. Plastic surgery on body image, body satisfaction and self-esteem // Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae. 2020. Vol. 61(1–4). P. 3–9.
31. Little A.C., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research // Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2011. Vol. 366 (1571). P. 1638–1659. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.
32. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals // Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018. Vol. 34(5). P. 458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
33. Петленко В.П. Основные методологические проблемы теории медицины. Л.: Медицина, 1982. 256 с.
34. Эспинас А.В. Социальная жизнь животных: опыт сравнительной психологии. М.: ЛИБРОКОМ, 2012. 319 с.
35. Samson N., Fink B., Matts P.J. Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance // International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2010. Vol. 32 (3). P. 167–184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2494.2009.00535.x.
36. Brierley M.E., Brooks K.R., Mond J. et al. The body and the beautiful: health, asttractiveness and body composition in mens and womens bodies // PLos One. 2016. Vol. 11 (6). e0156722. DOI: 0.1371/journal.pone.0156722.
37. Weeden J., Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review // Psychological Bulletin. 2005. Vol. 131 (5). P. 635–653. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.131.5.635.
38. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals // Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018. Vol. 34(5). P. 458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
39. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty // Annual Review of Psychology. 2006. Vol. 57. P. 199–226. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
40. Milutinovic J., Zelic K., Nedeljkovoc N. Evaluation of facial beauty using antropometric proportions // The Scientific World Journal. 2014. Vol. 20. 428250. DOI: 10.1155/2014/428250.
41. Fisher M.L., Voracek M. The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness // Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2006. Vol. 5(2). P. 190–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473–2165.2006.00249.x.
42. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7 (8). e42593. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
43. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness // Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2003. Vol. 26. № 3. Suppl. Р. 45–48.
44. Lephart E.D. A review of the role of estrogen in dermal aging and facial attractiveness in women // Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2018. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 282–288. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12508
45. Lephart E.D. Human scalp hair: modulation by various factors and hormones do estrogens inhibit or stimulate: a perplexing perspective // Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2019. Vol. 18. № 6. P. 1860–1865. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12888
46. Whitehead R.D., Ozakinci G., Perrett D.I. Attractive skin coloration: harnessing sexual selection to improve diet and health // Evolutionary Psychology. 2012. Vol. 10 (5). P. 842–854.
47. Dion K.K. Young childrens stereotyping of facial attractiveness // Developmental Psychology. 1973. Vol. 9. P. 183–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.007.
48. Jacobson A.S., Trivers R., Palestis B.G. Number of friends and self-perception among Jamaican children: the role of attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry // Journal of Biosocial Science. 2020. Vol. 52 (2). P. 184–197. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932019000373.
49. Langlois J.H., Ritter J.M., Roggman L.A. et al. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces // Developmental Psychology. 1991. Vol. 27. P. 79–84. DOI:10.1037/0012–1649.27.1.79
50. Ngaage M., Agius M. The psychology of scars: a mini-review // Psychiatria Danubina. 2018. Vol. 30. Suppl. 7. P. 633–638.
51. Šitum M., Kolić M., Buljan M. Psychodermatology // Acta Medica Croatica. 2016. Vol. 70. Suppl. 1. P. 35–38
52. Zaidel D.W. Neuroesthetics is not just about art // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. P. 80. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00080
53. Swami V., Laughton R., Grover S. et al. Asexuality is inversely associated with positive
body image in British adults // Heliyon. 2019. Vol. 5 (9). e02452. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02452.
54. Valentova J.V., Kleisner K., Havlíček J. et al. Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men // Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014. Vol. 43 (2). P. 353–361. DOI: 10.1007/s10508–013–0194–x.
55. Sorokowska A. Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli // Personality and Individual Differences. 2013. Vol. 55. P. 175–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.026.
56. Lundström J.N., Olsson M.J. Functional neuronal processing of human body odors // Vitamins and Hormones. 2010. Vol. 83. P. 1–23. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83001–8.
57. Sergeant M.J. Female perception of male body odor // Vitamins and Hormones. 2010. Vol. 83. P. 25–45. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83002–X.
58. Valentova J.V., Varella M.A., Havlíček J. et al. Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: a cross-cultural study // Behavioural Processes. 2017. Vol. 135. P. 95–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.005.
59. Walter K.V., Conroy-Beam D., Buss D.M. et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a largescale replication // Psychological Science. 2020. Vol. 31 (4). P. 408–423. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620904154.
References
1. Marshall C.D., Hu M.S., Leavit T. et al. Cutaneous scarring: basic science, current treatments, and future directions. Advances in Wound Care. 2018; 7(2):29–45. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2016.0696.2. Rumsey N., Harcourt D. The psychology of appearance. McGraw-Hill: Open University Press. 2005:256.
3. Sarwer D.B. Body image, cosmetic surgery, and minimally invasive treatments. Body Image. 2019; 31:302–308. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.01.009.
4. Kulikov L.V. Emotsionalnaya ustoichivost lichnosti [Emotional stability of personality]. St. Petersburg: Faculty of Psychology of St. Petersburg State University, 2008:41. (in Russ.).
5. Carrard I., Argyrides M., Ioannou X. et al. Associations between body dissatisfaction, importance of appearance, and aging anxiety with depression, and appearance-related behaviors in women in mid-life. Journal of Women and Aging. 2019; 21:1–14. DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2019.1681882.
6. Libina A. Psikhologiya sovremennoi zhenshchiny [Psychology of a modern woman]. Moscow: Eksmo, 2003:816. (in Russ.).
7. Izard K. Psikhologiya emotsii [Psychology of emotions]. St. Petersburg: Peter, 2006:464. (in Russ.).
8. Yaremenko S.N. Vneshnost cheloveka v kulture [The appearance of a person in culture]. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing Center of DSTU, 1997:172. (in Russ.).
9. Hashim P.W., Nia J.K., Taliercio M. et al. Ideals of facial beauty. Cutis. 2017; 100(4):222–224.
10. Swami V., Weis L., Barron D. et al. Positive body image is positively associated with hedonic (emotional) and eudaimonic (psychological and social) well-being in British adults. The Journal of Social Psychology. 2018; 158(5):541–552. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1392278.
11. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42593. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
12. Halsey L.G., Huber J.W., Bufton R.D.J. et al. An explanation for enhanced perceptions of attractiveness after alcohol consumption. Alcohol. 2010; 44(4):307–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.02.001.
13. Bowdring M.A., Sayette M.A. Perception of physical attractiveness when consuming and not consuming alcohol: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2018; 16. DOI: 10.1111/add.14227. 29660184.
14. DeBrune L.M., Jones B.C., Perett D.I. Womens attractiveness of self-resembling faces change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior. 2005; 47(4):379–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.006.
15. Zhu Q., Kou H., Bi T.Y. Processing mechanism of social cues in faces. Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2019; 71(1):73–85.
16. Peterson R.D., Palmer C.L. Effects of physical attractiveness of political beliefs. Politics and the Life Sciences. 2017; 36(2):3–16. DOI: 10.1017/pls.2017.18.
17. Kranz D., Nadarevic L., Erdfelder E. Bald and bad? Experimental evidence for a dual-process account of baldness stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2019; 66 (5):340–354. DOI: 10.1027/1618–3169/a000457.
18. Cash T.F., Kilcullen R.N. The aye of the beholder: susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1985; 15:591–605. DOI:10.1111/j.1559–1816.1985.tb00903.x
19. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J. et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. 2000; 126 (3):390–423. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.126.3.390.
20. Maestripieri D., Henry A., Nickels N. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017; 40. e19. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X160000340.
21. Sigall H. Beautiful but dangerous: effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridical judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975; 31:410–414. DOI:10.1037/h0076472.
22. Zaidel D.W., Bava S., Reis V.A. Relationship between facial asymmetry and judging trustworthiness in faces. Laterality. 2003; 8(3):225–232. DOI: 10.1080/13576500244000120.
23. .Schein S.S., Langlois J.H. Unattractive infant faces elicit negative affect from adults. Infant Behavior and Development. 2015; 38:130–134. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.12.009.
24. Fromm E. Chelovek dlya sebya. Revolyutsiya nadezhdy. Imet ili byt [A man for himself. The revolution of hope. To have or to be]. Moscow: AST, 2007:602.
25. Guest E., Costa B., Williamson H. et al. The effectiveness of interventions aiming to promote positive body image in adults: a systematic review. Body Image. 2019; 30:10–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.04.002.
26. Bagnenko E.S. [The system of significant relationships of women seeking cosmetological help]. Obozrenie psikhiatrii i meditsinskoi psikhologii im. V.M. Bekhtereva = Review of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology named after V.M. Bekhterev. 2012; 3:42–47.
27. Balkrishnan R., McMichael A.J, Hu J.Y. et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in women with severe facial blemishes. International Journal of Dermatology. 2006; 45(2):111–115.
28. Sadick N.S. The impact of cosmetic interventions on quality of life. Dermatology Online Journal. 2008; 14 (8):2.
29. Asimakopoulou E., Zavrides H., Askitis T. Plastic surgery on body image, body satisfaction and self-esteem. Acta Chirurgiae Plasticae. 2020; 61(1–4):3–9.
30. Little A.C., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M. Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2011; 366(1571):1638–1659. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.
31. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018; 34(5):458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
32. Petlenko V.P. Osnovnye metodologicheskie problemy teorii meditsiny [Basic methodological problems of the theory of medicine]. Leningrad: Medicine, 1982:256.
33. Espinas A.V. Sotsialnaya zhizn zhivotnykh: opyt sravnitelnoi psikhologii [The social life of animals: the experience of comparative psychology]. Moscow: LIBROCOM, 2012:319.
34. Samson N., Fink B., Matts P.J. Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2010; 32(3):167–184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2494.2009.00535.x.
35. Samson N., Fink B., Matts P.J. Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. International Journal of Cosmetic Science. 2010; 32(3):167–184. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2494.2009.00535.x.
36. Brierley M.E., Brooks K.R., Mond J. et al. The body and the beautiful: health, asttractiveness and body composition in mens and womens bodies. PLos One. 2016; 11(6):e0156722. DOI: 0.1371/journal.pone.0156722.
37. Weeden J., Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: a review. Psychological Bulletin. 2005; 131(5):635–653. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.131.5.635.
38. Bueller H. Ideal facial relationships and goals. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2018; 34(5):458–465. DOI: 10.1055/s–0038–1669401.
39. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006; 57:199–226. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
40. Milutinovic J., Zelic K., Nedeljkovoc N. Evaluation of facial beauty using antropometric proportions. The Scientific World Journal. 2014; 20:428250. DOI:10.1155/2014/428250.
41. Fisher M.L., Voracek M. The shape of beauty: determinants of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2006; 5(2):190–194. DOI: 10.1111/j.1473–2165.2006.00249.x.
42. Swami V., Tovée M.J. The impact of psychological stress on mens judgements of female body size. PLoS One. 2012; 7(8):e42593. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0042593.
43. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2003; 26(3):45–48.
44. Lephart E.D. A review of the role of estrogen in dermal aging and facial attractiveness in women. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2018; 17(3):282–288. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12508
45. Lephart E.D. Human scalp hair: modulation by various factors and hormones do estrogens inhibit or stimulate: a perplexing perspective. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2019; 18(6):1860–1865. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12888
46. Whitehead R.D., Ozakinci G., Perrett D.I. Attractive skin coloration: harnessing sexual selection to improve diet and health. Evolutionary Psychology. 2012; 10(5):842–854.
47. Dion K.K. Young childrens stereotyping of facial attractiveness. Developmental Psychology. 1973; 9:183–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.007.
48. Jacobson A.S., Trivers R., Palestis B.G. Number of friends and self-perception among Jamaican children: the role of attractiveness and fluctuating asymmetry. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2020; 52(2):184–197. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932019000373.
49. Langlois J.H., Ritter J.M., Roggman L.A. et al. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology. 1991; 27:79–84. DOI:10.1037/0012–1649.27.1.79
50. Ngaage M., Agius M. The psychology of scars: a mini-review. Psychiatria Danubina. 2018; 30(7):633–638.
51. Šitum M., Kolić M., Buljan M. Psychodermatology. Acta Medica Croatica. 2016; 70(1):35–38.
52. Zaidel D.W. Neuroesthetics is not just about art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015; 9:80. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00080
53. Swami V., Laughton R., Grover S. et al. Asexuality is inversely associated with positive body image in British adults. Heliyon. 2019; 5(9):e02452. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02452.
54. Valentova J.V., Kleisner K., Havlíček J. et al. Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014; 43(2):353–361. DOI: 10.1007/s10508–013–0194–x.
55. Sorokowska A. Seeing or smelling? Assessing personality on the basis of different stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013; 55:175–179. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.026.
56. Lundström J.N., Olsson M.J. Functional neuronal processing of human body odors. Vitamins and Hormones. 2010; 83:1–23. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83001–8.
57. Sergeant M.J. Female perception of male body odor. Vitamins and Hormones. 2010; 83:25–45. DOI: 10.1016/S0083–6729(10)83002–X.
58. Valentova J.V., Varella M.A., Havlíček J. et al. Positive association between vocal and facial attractiveness in women but not in men: a cross-cultural study. Behavioural Processes. 2017; 135:95–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.12.005.
59. Walter K.V., Conroy–Beam D., Buss D.M. et al. Sex differences in mate preferences across 45 countries: a large-scale replication. Psychological Science. 2020; 31(4):408–423. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620904154
Опубликован
2021-12-31
Как цитировать
Багненко, Е. (2021). РОЛЬ ВНЕШНОСТИ В СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ АДАПТАЦИИ ЧЕЛОВЕКА. Психология. Психофизиология, 14(4), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps210410
Выпуск
Раздел
Социальная психология, политическая и экономическая психология
Copyright (c) 2021 Психология. Психофизиология
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
