ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ ПОВЕДЕНИЕ КАК ПРОБЛЕМА ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ В ОТЕЧЕСТВЕННОЙ И ЗАРУБЕЖНОЙ ПСИХОЛОГИИ
Ключевые слова:
экологическая психология, экологическое поведение, проэкологическое поведение, проэкологическая самоидентификация, активное и пассивное экологическое поведение, экологическая идентичность, экологическое стремление, экологически ответственное поведение, индекс экологической эффективности личности, экологические модели поведения
Аннотация
В статье представлен аналитический обзор зарубежных и отечественных исследований по проблеме экологического поведения как психологического феномена. Рассмотрены виды (активное или пассивное) и цели экологического поведения (созидательные и разрушающие). Обсуждаются проблемы теоретических трактовок и множественных контекстов в понимании базовых концептов экологической психологии, ее недостаточная терминологическая определенность. Выделены магистральные научные направления исследований экологического поведения и смежных феноменов: проэкологическое поведение и возраст; проэкологическое поведение, идентичность и
самоидентификация; коллективная эффективность и проэкологические намерения;
проэкологическое поведение, гражданская и личная ответственность; проэкологическое поведение и черты личности; ценности, убеждения и нормы как предикторы заботы об окружающей среде; проэкологическое поведение, личностные качества и индекс экологической эффективности; экологические модели поведения. Описывается структура модели проэкологического поведения, включающая: 1) идентификацию поведения, подлежащего изменению, 2) изучение основных факторов, лежащих в основе этого поведения, 3) разработку и применение вмешательств для изменения поведения с целью уменьшения воздействия на окружающую среду, 4) оценку результатов вмешательства. Выявляется общая тенденция современных исследований экологического поведения, проявляющаяся в стремлении интегрировать решение практических задач с необходимостью теоретического осмысления конструктов и моделей экологического поведения. Отмечается несоразмерность значения исследования экологического поведения
в рамках экологической психологии и количества конкретных разработок, направленных на ее решение, что позволяет говорить о существовании базового научного противоречия (между запросами практики и недостатком научных исследований, которые могли бы удовлетворить эти запросы), определяющего актуальность проблемы экологического поведения.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока не доступны.
Литература
1. 1-я Российская конференция по экологической психологии. Тезисы (Москва, 3–5 декабря 1996 г.). – М.: Психологический институт РАО, 1996. – 181 с.
2. Дерябо, С.Д. Методологические проблемы становления и развития экологической психологии / С.Д. Дерябо, В.А. Ясвин // Психологический журнал. – 1996. – Т. 17, № 6. – С. 4.
3. Залевский, Г.В. Экологическая проблема: проблемы экологического здоровья / Г.В. Залевский, Ю.В. Кузмина // Психология в экономике и управлении. – 2012. – № 1. – С. 17–20.
4. Медведев, В.И. Экологическое сознание / В.И. Медведев, А.А. Алдашева. – М.: Логос, 2001. – 384 с.
5. Панов, В.И. Экологическая психология. Опыт построения методологии. – М.: Наука, 2004. – 197 с.
6. Рыжкова, М.И. Экологическое сознание: уровень проэкологического поведения городского населения // Психология в меняющемся мире: проблемы, гипотезы, исследования: сб. статей Междунар. студенч. науч.-практ. конф. – Челябинск: Издательский центр ЮУрГУ, 2019. – 341 с.
7. Смолова, Л.В. Психология взаимодействия с окружающей средой. Экологическая психология / Л.В. Смолова. – СПб.: СПбИпиСР, 2010. – 712 с.
8. Стерлигова, Е.А. Экологическая психология / Е.А. Стерлигова. – Пермь, 2012. − 212 с.
9. Alisat, S. The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation / S. Alisat, M. Riemer // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2015. – Vol. 43. – P. 13–23.
10. Charis, E.A. Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation / E.A. Charis, C. Lawrence // Journal of Environ mental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 40. – P. 451–461.
11. Collado, S. The role played by age on childrens pro-ecological behaviors: An exploratory analysis / S. Collado, G.W. Evans, J.A. Corraliza, M.A. Sorrel // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 44. –
P. 309–317.
12. Devine-Wright, P. Introduction to the special issue: Place, identity and environmental behavior / P. Devine-Wright, S. Clayton // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30, Is. 3. – Р. 267–270.
13. Gkargkavouzi, A.A Multi-dimensional measure of environmental behavior: Exploring the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview and environmental concern / A. Gkargkavouzi, G. Halkos, S. Matsiori // MPRA Paper 84631. – 2018. – University Library of Munich, Germany. – 24 p.
14. Hirsh, J.B. Environmental sustainability and national personality / J.B. Hirsh // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 38. – P. 233–240.
15. Hirsh, J.B. Personality and environmental concern / J.B. Hirsh // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30. – Р. 245–248.
16. Ito, K. Why do cosmopolitan individuals tend to be more pro-environmentally committed? The mediating pathways via knowledge acquisition and emotional affinity toward nature / K. Ito, A.K.-y. Leung, T. Huang // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2020. – № art. 101395.
17. Mackay, C.M.L. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis / C.M.L. Mackay, M.T. Schmitt // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2019. – Vol. 65. – No. art. 101323.
18. Otto, S. Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older / S. Otto, F.G. Kaiser // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 40. – P. 331–338.
19. Scannell, L. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and proenvironmental behavior / L. Scannell, R. Gifford // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30, Is. 3. – P. 289–297.
20. Sowon, L.T. Who are the good organizational citizens for the environment? An examination of the predictive validity of personality traits / L.T. Sowon, K.S. Fernandez // Journal of environmental psychology. – 2016. – Vol. 48. – P. 185–190.
21. Steg, L. An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals / L. Steg, J.W. Bolderdijk, K. Keizer, G. Perlaviciute // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 38. – P. 104–115.
22. Steg, L. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda / L. Steg, C. Vlek // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 29, Is. 3. – P. 309–317.
23. Werff, E. Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are / E. Werff, L. Steg, Keizer K. // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 40. – P. 273–282.
24. Whitmarsh, L. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse proenvironmental behaviours / L. Whitmarsh, S. ONeill // Journal of environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30, Is. 3. – P. 305–314.
25. Winkel, G. An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges / G. Winkel, S. Saegert, G.W. Evans // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 29, Is. 3. – P. 318–328.
2. Deryabo S.D., Yasvin V.A. [Methodological problems of formation and development of ecological psychology]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal], 1996, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 4. (in Russ.)
3. Zalevskij G.V., Kuzmina Yu.V. [Ecological psychology: problems of ecological health]. Psihologiya v ekonomike i upravlenii [Psychology in economics and management], 2012, no. 1, pp. 17–20. (in Russ.)
4. Medvedev V.I., Aldasheva A.A. Ekologicheskoe soznanie [Ecological consciousness]. Moscow, Logos, 2001. 384 p.
5. Panov V.I. Ekologicheskaya psikhologiya. Opyt postroeniya metodologii [Ecological psychology. Experience in building a methodology]. Moscow: Nauka, 2004. 197 p.
6. Ryzhkova M.I. [Environmental awareness: the level of Pro-environmental behavior of the urban population] Psihologiya v menyayushchemsya mire: problemy, gipotezy, issledovaniya: Sbornik
Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Psychology in a changing world: problems,
hypotheses, research: collection of articles by internat. science.-practical. conf.]. Chelyabinsk, South Ural St. Univ. Publ., 2019. 341 p. (in Russ.)
7. Smolova L.V. Psihologiya vzaimodejstviya s okruzhayushchej sredoj. Ekologicheskaya psihologiya [Psychology of interaction with the environment. Environmental psychology]. St. Petersburg, 2010. 712 p.
8. Sterligova E.A. Ekologicheskaya psikhologiya [Environmental psychology]. Perm, 2012. 212 p.
9. Alisat S., Riemer M. The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, vol. 43, pp. 13–23.
10. Charis E.A., Lawrence C. Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place
attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 40, pp. 451–461.
11. Collado S., Evans G.W., Corraliza J.A., Sorrel M.A. The role played by age on childrens proecological
behaviors: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, vol. 44, pp. 309–317.
12. Devine-Wright P., Clayton S. Introduction to the special issue: Place, identity and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, is. 3, pp. 267–270.
13. Gkargkavouzi A.A., Halkos G., Matsiori S. Multi-dimensional measure of environmental behavior: Exploring the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview and environmental concern. MPRA Paper 84631, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2018. 24 p.
14. Hirsh J.B. Environmental sustainability and national personality Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 38, pp. 233–240.
15. Hirsh J.B. Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, pp. 245–248.
16. Ito K., Leung A.K.-y., Huang T. Why do cosmopolitan individuals tend to be more proenvironmentally
committed? The mediating pathways via knowledge acquisition and emotional affinity toward nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2020, no. art. 101395.
17. Mackay C.M.L., Schmitt M.T. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019, vol. 65, no. art. 101323.
18. Otto S., Kaiser F.G. Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 40, pp. 331–338.
19. Scannell L., Gifford R. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and proenvironmental
behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, is. 3, pp. 289–297.
20. Sowon L.T., Fernandez K.S. Who are the good organizational citizens for the environment? An examination of the predictive validity of personality traits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, vol. 48, pp. 185–190.
21. Steg L., Bolderdijk J.W., Keizer K., Perlaviciute G. An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 38, pp. 104–115.
22. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, vol. 29, is. 3, pp. 309–317.
23. Werff E., Steg L., Keizer K. Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 40, pp. 273–282.
24. Whitmarsh L., ONeill S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental selfidentity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, is. 3, pp. 305–314.
25. Winkel G., Saegert S., Evans G.W. An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, vol. 29, is. 3, pp. 318–328.
2. Дерябо, С.Д. Методологические проблемы становления и развития экологической психологии / С.Д. Дерябо, В.А. Ясвин // Психологический журнал. – 1996. – Т. 17, № 6. – С. 4.
3. Залевский, Г.В. Экологическая проблема: проблемы экологического здоровья / Г.В. Залевский, Ю.В. Кузмина // Психология в экономике и управлении. – 2012. – № 1. – С. 17–20.
4. Медведев, В.И. Экологическое сознание / В.И. Медведев, А.А. Алдашева. – М.: Логос, 2001. – 384 с.
5. Панов, В.И. Экологическая психология. Опыт построения методологии. – М.: Наука, 2004. – 197 с.
6. Рыжкова, М.И. Экологическое сознание: уровень проэкологического поведения городского населения // Психология в меняющемся мире: проблемы, гипотезы, исследования: сб. статей Междунар. студенч. науч.-практ. конф. – Челябинск: Издательский центр ЮУрГУ, 2019. – 341 с.
7. Смолова, Л.В. Психология взаимодействия с окружающей средой. Экологическая психология / Л.В. Смолова. – СПб.: СПбИпиСР, 2010. – 712 с.
8. Стерлигова, Е.А. Экологическая психология / Е.А. Стерлигова. – Пермь, 2012. − 212 с.
9. Alisat, S. The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation / S. Alisat, M. Riemer // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2015. – Vol. 43. – P. 13–23.
10. Charis, E.A. Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation / E.A. Charis, C. Lawrence // Journal of Environ mental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 40. – P. 451–461.
11. Collado, S. The role played by age on childrens pro-ecological behaviors: An exploratory analysis / S. Collado, G.W. Evans, J.A. Corraliza, M.A. Sorrel // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 44. –
P. 309–317.
12. Devine-Wright, P. Introduction to the special issue: Place, identity and environmental behavior / P. Devine-Wright, S. Clayton // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30, Is. 3. – Р. 267–270.
13. Gkargkavouzi, A.A Multi-dimensional measure of environmental behavior: Exploring the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview and environmental concern / A. Gkargkavouzi, G. Halkos, S. Matsiori // MPRA Paper 84631. – 2018. – University Library of Munich, Germany. – 24 p.
14. Hirsh, J.B. Environmental sustainability and national personality / J.B. Hirsh // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 38. – P. 233–240.
15. Hirsh, J.B. Personality and environmental concern / J.B. Hirsh // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30. – Р. 245–248.
16. Ito, K. Why do cosmopolitan individuals tend to be more pro-environmentally committed? The mediating pathways via knowledge acquisition and emotional affinity toward nature / K. Ito, A.K.-y. Leung, T. Huang // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2020. – № art. 101395.
17. Mackay, C.M.L. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis / C.M.L. Mackay, M.T. Schmitt // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2019. – Vol. 65. – No. art. 101323.
18. Otto, S. Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older / S. Otto, F.G. Kaiser // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 40. – P. 331–338.
19. Scannell, L. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and proenvironmental behavior / L. Scannell, R. Gifford // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30, Is. 3. – P. 289–297.
20. Sowon, L.T. Who are the good organizational citizens for the environment? An examination of the predictive validity of personality traits / L.T. Sowon, K.S. Fernandez // Journal of environmental psychology. – 2016. – Vol. 48. – P. 185–190.
21. Steg, L. An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals / L. Steg, J.W. Bolderdijk, K. Keizer, G. Perlaviciute // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 38. – P. 104–115.
22. Steg, L. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda / L. Steg, C. Vlek // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 29, Is. 3. – P. 309–317.
23. Werff, E. Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are / E. Werff, L. Steg, Keizer K. // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 40. – P. 273–282.
24. Whitmarsh, L. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse proenvironmental behaviours / L. Whitmarsh, S. ONeill // Journal of environmental Psychology. – 2010. – Vol. 30, Is. 3. – P. 305–314.
25. Winkel, G. An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges / G. Winkel, S. Saegert, G.W. Evans // Journal of Environmental Psychology. – 2009. – Vol. 29, Is. 3. – P. 318–328.
References
1. 1-ya Rossijskaya konferenciya po ekologicheskoj psihologii. Tezisy (Moskva, 3–5 dekabrya 1996 g.). [1st Russian Conference on Ecological Psychology. Theses (Moscow, December 3–5, 1996)]. Moscow, Psychological institute of Russian joint stock company, 1996. 181 p.2. Deryabo S.D., Yasvin V.A. [Methodological problems of formation and development of ecological psychology]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological journal], 1996, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 4. (in Russ.)
3. Zalevskij G.V., Kuzmina Yu.V. [Ecological psychology: problems of ecological health]. Psihologiya v ekonomike i upravlenii [Psychology in economics and management], 2012, no. 1, pp. 17–20. (in Russ.)
4. Medvedev V.I., Aldasheva A.A. Ekologicheskoe soznanie [Ecological consciousness]. Moscow, Logos, 2001. 384 p.
5. Panov V.I. Ekologicheskaya psikhologiya. Opyt postroeniya metodologii [Ecological psychology. Experience in building a methodology]. Moscow: Nauka, 2004. 197 p.
6. Ryzhkova M.I. [Environmental awareness: the level of Pro-environmental behavior of the urban population] Psihologiya v menyayushchemsya mire: problemy, gipotezy, issledovaniya: Sbornik
Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Psychology in a changing world: problems,
hypotheses, research: collection of articles by internat. science.-practical. conf.]. Chelyabinsk, South Ural St. Univ. Publ., 2019. 341 p. (in Russ.)
7. Smolova L.V. Psihologiya vzaimodejstviya s okruzhayushchej sredoj. Ekologicheskaya psihologiya [Psychology of interaction with the environment. Environmental psychology]. St. Petersburg, 2010. 712 p.
8. Sterligova E.A. Ekologicheskaya psikhologiya [Environmental psychology]. Perm, 2012. 212 p.
9. Alisat S., Riemer M. The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, vol. 43, pp. 13–23.
10. Charis E.A., Lawrence C. Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place
attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 40, pp. 451–461.
11. Collado S., Evans G.W., Corraliza J.A., Sorrel M.A. The role played by age on childrens proecological
behaviors: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, vol. 44, pp. 309–317.
12. Devine-Wright P., Clayton S. Introduction to the special issue: Place, identity and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, is. 3, pp. 267–270.
13. Gkargkavouzi A.A., Halkos G., Matsiori S. Multi-dimensional measure of environmental behavior: Exploring the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview and environmental concern. MPRA Paper 84631, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2018. 24 p.
14. Hirsh J.B. Environmental sustainability and national personality Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 38, pp. 233–240.
15. Hirsh J.B. Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, pp. 245–248.
16. Ito K., Leung A.K.-y., Huang T. Why do cosmopolitan individuals tend to be more proenvironmentally
committed? The mediating pathways via knowledge acquisition and emotional affinity toward nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2020, no. art. 101395.
17. Mackay C.M.L., Schmitt M.T. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2019, vol. 65, no. art. 101323.
18. Otto S., Kaiser F.G. Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 40, pp. 331–338.
19. Scannell L., Gifford R. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and proenvironmental
behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, is. 3, pp. 289–297.
20. Sowon L.T., Fernandez K.S. Who are the good organizational citizens for the environment? An examination of the predictive validity of personality traits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, vol. 48, pp. 185–190.
21. Steg L., Bolderdijk J.W., Keizer K., Perlaviciute G. An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 38, pp. 104–115.
22. Steg L., Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, vol. 29, is. 3, pp. 309–317.
23. Werff E., Steg L., Keizer K. Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 40, pp. 273–282.
24. Whitmarsh L., ONeill S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental selfidentity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, vol. 30, is. 3, pp. 305–314.
25. Winkel G., Saegert S., Evans G.W. An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, vol. 29, is. 3, pp. 318–328.
Опубликован
2020-05-14
Как цитировать
Морозова, С., & Козлов, В. (2020). ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКОЕ ПОВЕДЕНИЕ КАК ПРОБЛЕМА ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ В ОТЕЧЕСТВЕННОЙ И ЗАРУБЕЖНОЙ ПСИХОЛОГИИ. Психология. Психофизиология, 13(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps200102
Выпуск
Раздел
Общая психология, психология личности, история психологии
Copyright (c) 2020 Психология. Психофизиология
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
