Mapping the associative structure of sportswear brand image

Piastro R.; Barmin A.

doi:10.14529/jpps250209

R. A. Piastro Moscow State Linguistic University (17 Taininskaya str., Moscow, 129345, Russia) https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2245-2248 piastro5584@gmail.com
A. V. Barmin Moscow State Linguistic University, (6 Volokolamsk highway, Moscow, 125080, Russia) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9658-6621 a.b.barmin@linguanet.ru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps250209

Keywords: brand, brand image, brand perception, brand marketing, consumer psychology, consumer behavior, consumer memory, free associations, semantic networks, conceptual maps

Abstract

Introduction. Understanding a brand’s associative structure is crucial for developing effective marketing strategies. Conceptual mapping enables visualization of brand image as an aggregated semantic network, allowing marketers to analyze brand perception at different structural levels. Aims. This study examines the associative structures of sportswear brands Adidas and Puma to identify key differences in their brand images. Materials and methods. This study employs a three-stage conceptual mapping approach: Stage 1. association generation; Stage 2. individual map creation; Stage 3. aggregate map construction. Study participants – Russian sample: Stage 1 – 35 Adidas consumers (gender: 14 m, 21 f, age: M = 23); 31 Puma consumers (gender: 9 m, 22 f, age: M = 25); Stage 2 – 19 Adidas consumers (gender: 6 m, 13 f, age: M = 20); 17 Puma consumers (gender: 5 m, 12 f, age: M = 20). Results. The analysis reveals distinct associative patterns between brands, demonstrating how sportswear brand images differ structurally. These findings enable assessment of brand image alignment with corporate marketing objectives. Conclusion. The study demonstrates the utility of conceptual mapping for brand image analysis, as exemplified by Adidas and Puma.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

R. A. Piastro , Moscow State Linguistic University (17 Taininskaya str., Moscow, 129345, Russia)

Student, Department of Psychology and Pedagogical Anthropology

A. V. Barmin , Moscow State Linguistic University, (6 Volokolamsk highway, Moscow, 125080, Russia)

Junior researcher, Laboratory of Cognitive Research of the Basics of Communication

References

1. Arshinova M.A. Image of the brand as the result of its perception by consumers. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation and investment. 2018;(4):168–171. (in Russ.).
2. Ivashkova N.I., Timokhina G.S., Shirochenskaya I.P. Management of digital brand image based on feedback loops. MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie) = MID (Modernization. Innovation. Development). 2024;15(1):115–131. (in Russ.).
3. Eshmatov S.M. Methodological aspects of forming a national brand for food products. Iqtisodiyot va taʼlim. 2022;23(1):94–98. (in Russ.).
4. Aaker D.A. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. Journal of Marketing. 1992;56(2):125–128. DOI: 10.2307/1252048
5. Keller K.L. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing. 1993;57(1):1–22. DOI: 10.1177/002224299305700101
6. Cian L. How to measure brand image: A reasoned review. The Marketing Review. 2011;11(2):165–187.
7. Teichert T.A., Schöntag K. Exploring consumer knowledge structures using associative network analysis. Psychology and Marketing. 2010;27(4):369–398.
8. Anderson J.R. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1983.
9. Belén del Río A., Vazquez R., Iglesias V. The effects of brand associations on consumer response. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2001;18(5):410–425. DOI: 10.1108/07363760110398808
10. John D.R., Loken B., Kim K., Monga A.B. Brand concept maps: A methodology for identifying brand association networks. Journal of Marketing Research. 2006;43(4):549–563. DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.43.4.549
11. Min X., Liu Y., Liu Y. Local youths perception of tourism citys brand image. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2024;8(8):5289. DOI: 10.24294/jipd.v8i8.5289
12. Yusof M.H.M., Mustafa H. The brand image and brand associations of Langkawi and Phuket: A brand concept map analysis. Sains Humanika. 2020;12(2). DOI: 10.11113/sh.v12n2.1554
13. Dehdashti Z. Perceptual network mapping of Hamraheh Aval by brand concept map. Quarterly Journal of Brand Management. 2019;6(4):109–133.
14. Shahrokh D.Z., Bashirpour M. Mapping the perception network of Irans Middle Eastern Bank: Using brand conceptual map. Iranian Journal of Management Sciences. 2019;14(53):89–108.
15. Bakhshizadeh K.B., Rajaei M., Bashirpour M. Network mapping of internal messengers brand associations (Case study: Soroush Messenger). Quarterly Journal of Brand Management. 2020;7(1):127–167. DOI: 10.22051/BMR.2020.32678.2035
16. Zhang J., Li J. A study on consumer perception of NFT based on brand concept map. European Journal of Information Technologies and Computer Science. 2023;3(4):30–34. DOI: 10.24018/compute.2023.3.4.118
17. Mokrova L.P. Patterns and uniqueness of crises: Industry-specific features of sports organizations. Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya = The economics of sustainable development. 2023;(4):161–164. Available at: http://elib.fa.ru/art2023/bv2454.pdf (accessed 25.09.2024) (in Russ.).
18. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1975. Available at: https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html (accessed 25.09.2024)

References on translit

-