Age determinants of mental performance in gifted children
Abstract
Introduction. Nowadays, education makes high demands on both mental abilities and emotional and volitional qualities, such as endurance, resistance, and the ability to cope with long-term mental stress, which ensure a child’s mental activity. This mostly appeals to gifted children, since their academic workload is higher and their mental health is often reduced. This makes relevant the problem of the age determinants of mental performance in gifted children to improve their educational activities. Aims. To identify the optimal performance of gifted children in academic settings with respect to age, physiological, and mental characteristics of a child. Materials and methods. The research involved 150 children of the Penza Boarding School for Gifted Children (age: 17–18 years [Grades 10–11; n = 50]; 15–16 years [Grades 8–9;
n = 50]; 13–14 years [Grades 6–7; n = 50]; sex: male, n = 80; female, n = 70). The introspection method was used with a diary for self-observation developed by the authors. Results. A significant difference during the day and week was observed in the performance of gifted children depending on age. Conclusion. Weekly academic activities, both mental and physical, should be distributed with respect to the age determinants of mental performance in gifted children.
Downloads
References
2. Lo C.O., Porath M. Paradigm shifts in gifted education: an examination vis-à-vis its historical situatedness and pedagogical sensibilities. Gifted child quarterly. 2017;61(4):343–360.
3. Rubinshtein S.L. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter. 2019:720. (in Russ.).
4. Schmitt A.J., Piselli K., Hoffman R.L., Schreiber J.B. Factor analysis of a modified characteristic of giftedness scale. Contemporary School Psychology. 2021;25:589–594. DOI: 10.1007/s40688-019-00268-7
5. Pérez J., Aperribai L., Cortabarría L., Borges, A. Examining the most and least changeable elements of the social representation of giftedness. Sustainability. 2020;12(13):5361. DOI: 10.3390/su12135361
6. Sternberg R.J., Kaufman S.B. Theories and conceptions of giftedness. Handbook of giftedness in children: psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices. Ch. 3. Ed. Pfeiffer S. Cham: Springer. 2018:29– 47. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_3
7. Peskov V.P., Shigapova N.V. Kulik A. et al. Metody obucheniya i razvitiya detei s priznakami odarennosti [Method evaluates and develops children with signs of abilities]. Ed. N.V. Tulip. Krasnoyarsk: Information Center. 2012:252. (in Russ.).
8. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B., Shadrikov V.D., Babaeva Yu.D. et al. Rabochaya kontseptsiya odarennosti [The working concept of giftedness]. Moscow. 2003. URL: https://lib.ipran.ru/upload/papers/paper_20480094.pdf (accessed: 22.07.2023). (in Russ.).
9. Stern V. Umstvennaya odarennost: Psikhologicheskie metody ispytaniya umstvennoi odarennosti v ikh primenenii k detyam shkolnogo vozrasta [Mental giftedness: Psychological methods of testing mental giftedness in their application to school-age children]. Ed. V.A. Mukov. St. Petersburg: SOYUZ, 1997:128. (in Russ.).
10. Shcheblanova E.I., Petrova S.O. Modern foreign researches of anxiety in intellectually gifted school children. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of modern foreign psychology. 2021;10(4):97–106. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100409
11. Dai D.Y. Evolving complexity theory of talent development. Conceptual frameworks for giftedness and talent development: enduring theories and comprehensive models in gifted education.
Eds. T.L. Cross, P. Olszewski-Kubilius. Routledge. 2020:1–27. DOI: 10.4324/9781003233787
12. Epskamp S., Fried E.I. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods. 2018;23(4):617–634. DOI: 10.1037/met0000167
13. Joukova E.S., Artemenkov S.L., Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. The Formation of Giftedness and Intelligence at School Age. New Ideas in Child and Educational Psychology. 2022;1-2:77–90. DOI: 10.11621/nicep.2022.0205
14. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B., Artemenkov S.L., Zhukova E.S. Longitudinal study on the development of giftedness. Eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya = Experimental psychology. 2021;14(3):122–137. (in Russ.). DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2021140309
15. Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Disclosure of the concepts of creativity and giftedness by stages of the development of cognition. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Russian psychological journal. 2021;18(3):159–168. (in Russ.).
16. Babaeva Yu.D. Dynamic theory of giftedness and its role in the identification, training and development of gifted children. Chelovek. Iskusstvo. Vselennaya = Human. Art. Universe. 2019;1:259–269. (in Russ.).
17. Gilford J. Tri storony intellekta [Three sides of intelligence]. Psikhologiya myshleniya [Psychology of thinking]. Ed. A.M. Matyushkin. Moscow: Progress. 1965:433–457.
18. Peskov V.P. The experience of psychological-medical-pedagogical support of gifted pupils of the lyceum Izvestiya instituta pedagogiki i psikhologii obrazovaniya = Proceedings of the Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Education. 2018;4:62–67. (in Russ.).
19. Teplov B.M. Psikhologiya i psikhofiziologiya individualnykh razlichii: izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Psychology and psychophysiology of individual differences: selected psychological works]. Moscow: MPSI; Voronezh: NGO “MODEK”. 2009:638. (in Russ.).
20. Worrell F.C., Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Dixson D.D. Gifted students. Annual review of psychology. 2019;70:551–576.
21. Shadrikov V.D. Sposobnosti i odarennost cheloveka [Human abilities and giftedness]. Moscow: IP RAS. 2019:274. (in Russ.).
22. Renzulli̇ J. Promoting Social Capital by Expanding the Conception of Giftedness. Talent. 2020;10(1):2–20.
References on translit
-Copyright (c) 2023 Psychology. Psychophysiology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.