Interpersonal relations of schoolchildren with different sibling position

Keywords: sibling position, younger students, teenagers, interpersonal relationships, interpersonal relations of schoolchildren

Abstract

Introduction: Building interpersonal relationships is an important part of development and socialization in childhood. The study of interpersonal relationships with respect to sibling positions will provide knowledge essential for an individual approach to the student. The ways of building interpersonal relationships change with time, as do the depth and significance of the relationships themselves. In this regard, the age factor is of particular interest and is considered a novelty in this study. Aims: this study was aimed at identifying the features of interpersonal relations among schoolchildren of different ages with different sibling positions. Materials and methods. An empirical study took place at secondary school No. 7 in Irkutsk. The study involved 149 schoolchildren (27: 10th grade, 49: 7th grade, and 73: 4th grade). At each age group, the sample was divided with respect to sibling positions (only, oldest, middle, and youngest). The following methods were used for adolescents: A. Rukavishnikov and V. Schutz’s questionnaire of interpersonal relations; L. Sobchik’s method for the assessment of interpersonal relations; and express diagnostics of social isolation (N. Russell and M. Ferguson). For younger students, Q-sorting and the “My Class” method were used. Statistical processing was performed with Fisher's transformation and the Mann–Whitney U-test. Results. At primary school age, middle children more often do not accept social, moral, and ethical group standards, are not prone to submission, and show cheerfulness and liveliness in communication. When it comes to the youngest sibling position, the characteristics of independence are less pronounced than others, and such children are less likely to defend their views. Among only children, a tendency to moderate sociability is expressed. During adolescence, middle children are more likely to establish close relationships, while the youngest ones are more cautious about this. Middle children are more eager to be accepted and more likely to feel frustrated in trusting relationships. The youngest children, more than others, do not accept control over themselves. Only children are more likely to show shyness and take on other people's responsibilities. Conclusion. The stability of some and the variability of other features of interpersonal relations were revealed in younger schoolchildren and adolescents with respect to their sibling position. Middle children differ from the rest largely, and their results are more variable with age. Only children show the greatest stability in the parameters under study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

E. V. Zulyanshina , Secondary school No. 4, Cherepanov (12, Partizanskaya st., Cherepanovo, Novosibirsk region, 633520, Russia)

Psychologist teacher

E. A. Kedyarova , Irkutsk State University (2 Chkalova St., Irkutsk, 664025, Russia)

Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology

V. V. Monzhievskaya , Irkutsk State University (2 Chkalova St., Irkutsk, 664025, Russia)

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogical and Developmental Psychology

M. Y. Uvarova , Irkutsk State University (2 Chkalova St., Irkutsk, 664025, Russia)

Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology

N. I. Chernetskaya , Irkutsk State University (2 Chkalova St., Irkutsk, 664025, Russia)

Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology

References

1. Kolominsky Ya.L., Rean A.A. Sotsialnaya pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Social Pedagogical Psychology]. St. Petersburg: Publ. Piter. 2000:416. (in Russ.).
2. Adler A. Individualnaya psikhologiya [Individual psychology]. St. Petersburg: Publ. Piter. 2022:256. (in Russ.).
3. Marano-Frezza K. An Analysis of Empirical Validity of Alfred Adlers Theory of Birth Or-der. Aletheia. 2017;2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21081/AX0082.
4. Sultan Н., Malik S. Adler birth order predicts personality characteristics in young adults. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2020;18(2):10–18. URL: https://gcu.edu.pk/pages/
gcupress/pjscp/volumes/02.-Subha-Malik-2.pdf (дата обращения 02.02.2023)
5. Russ S.A. General and specific in interpersonal behavior of adolescents of different birth order. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie = Education and self-development. 2014;3(41):99–102. (in Russ.).
6. Leman K. Poryadok rozhdeniya [Birth order]. Kyiv: Bright Books Publ., 2007:448. (in Russ.).
7. Eckstein D., Aycock K.J., Sperber M.A. et al. A review of 200 birth-order studies: lifestyle characteristics. Journal of Individual Psychology. 2010;66:408–434.
8. Schoenbek E. Starshii, srednii, mladshii… Kak ocherednost rozhdeniya rebenka vliyaet na formirovanie ego lichnosti [Senior, middle, junior… How the order of birth of a child affects the formation of his personality]. Moscow: Lomonosov Publ. 2010:240. (in Russ.).
9. Kozyreva V.V. Relationship between birth order in the parental family and qualitative characteristics of interpersonal relationships in adult life. Uchenye zapiski Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialnogo universiteta = Bulletin of Russian State Social University. 2014;4(127):295–299. (in Russ.).
10. Galimzyanova M.V., Petranovsky A.V. Self-perception and interpersonal relations of adults in connection with their sibling position and subjective experiences of childhood. Nauchnye issledovaniya vypusknikov fakulteta psikhologii SPBGU = Scientific research of graduates of the Faculty of Psychology of St. Petersburg State University. 2015;3:169–174. (in Russ.).
11. Andreeva A.D., Lisichkina A.G. Features of interpersonal relations of younger adolescents in the educational environment of modern and Soviet schools. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya = Theoretical and experimental psychology. 2020;2:39–49. (in Russ.).
12. Burmistrova E.A. Deti v seme. Psikhologiya vzaimootnoshenii [Children in the family. Psychology of relationships]. Moscow: Dar. 2020:352. (in Russ.).
13. Vorobieva K.V. On the formation of empathy in younger schoolchildren. Simvol nauki = Symbol of Science. 2020;11:170–173. (in Russ.).
14. Efremkina I.N. Study of the characteristics of socio-psychological characteristics in adolescents with different levels of trust in interpersonal relationships. Vestnik universiteta = Vestnik Universiteta. 2019;6:191–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-6-191-197 (in Russ.).
15. Kruglova E.V. Style of attachment and relationship with a romantic partner in siblings. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika = Bulletin of the Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2009;3:127–131. (in Russ.).
16. Levina E.A. Interpersonal conflicts in the system of relations of high school students. Byulleten nauki i praktiki = Bulletin of science and practice. 2020;5:496–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33619/ 2414-2948/54/68. (in Russ.).
17. Faith M., Elledge L., Newgent R., Cavell T. Conflict and Dominance Between Siblings as Predictors of Childrens Peer Victimization. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2015;24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0171-1.
18. Hashim R., Ahmad H., Mazuki M.A. et al. Sibling rivalry and offspring conflict: A review. American Scientific Publishers. 2017;23(1)3–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7167.

References on translit

-
Published
2023-06-30
How to Cite
Zulyanshina, E., Kedyarova, E., Monzhievskaya, V., Uvarova, M., & Chernetskaya, N. (2023). Interpersonal relations of schoolchildren with different sibling position. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 16(2), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps230208
Section
Social Psychology