THE FEATURES OF EMPATHY AND REFLECTION IN A PERSON AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF EDUCATION

  • G. V. Manuilov Medical Unit of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Chelyabinsk Region, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation gennadiymanuylovproduction@gmail.com
  • G. G. Gorelova South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5628-4415 gal.gorelowa2015@yandex.ru
  • E. F. Yashchenko Petersburg State University of Railways Emperor Alexander I, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-9385 elfed58@mail.ru
Keywords: empathy, reflection, personality, education and work-related activity, medical activity, self-reflection, socio-reflection

Abstract

Background: The article discusses empathy and reflection as psychological constructs in personality orientation during education and work-related activities. The article aims to study the features of empathy and reflection at different stages of education and work-related (for example, medicine-related) activities, as well as to search for the relationship between these constructs and certain individual psychological characteristics of a person. Materials and methods: The study involved 169 medical students aged from 17 to 30 years. The students were divided into 3 groups in accordance with the stages of education and work-related activities: first-year students (initial stage) – 59 persons, third-year students (practice-related stage) – 52 persons, fourth-year students (final stage of training) – 58 persons. The following research methods were used: the diagnosis of multicommunicative empathy after I.M. Yusupov, a technique for diagnosing the severity and direction of reflection by M. Grant, California Psychological Inventory. The following data processing methods were used: descriptive statistics, the Kruskal-Wallis test, the Kendall rank correlation coefficient, a multilayer perceptron neural network of a regression type. Results: The general level of empathy as a whole tends to increase from stage to stage and is higher at the final stage of education. In the structure of reflective processes, there is a predominance of self-reflection mechanisms aimed at analyzing one’s own inner world and are
associated with self-sufficiency and independence. Conclusion: Empathy is formed and developed when mastering the specifics and requirements of work-related activities. The predominance of self-reflection can adversely affect the understanding of the other person’s inner world, which is necessary for future subjects of socionomic professions. In the psychological profiles of students, there are qualities that conflict with each other and are the cause of intrapersonal conflicts, which lead to social maladaptation and frustration. Thus, psychological correction is required for resolving the identified contradictions at all stages of education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

G. V. Manuilov , Medical Unit of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation for the Chelyabinsk Region, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Doctor-psychiatrist

G. G. Gorelova , South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Doctor of psychological Sciences, Professor, senior researcher of the Department of General psychology, psychodiagnostics and psychological counseling

E. F. Yashchenko , Petersburg State University of Railways Emperor Alexander I, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Doctor of psychology, associate Professor, head of the Department of applied psychology

References

1. Andreeva G.M. Socialnaja psihologija [Social Psychology]. Moscow, Aspekt press, 1998, 363 p. (in Russ.).
2. Bodalev A.A. Psihologija obshhenija [Communication psychology]. Moscow, Institute of practical psychology; Voronezh: NPO “MODJeK”, 2002, 320 p. (in Russ.).
3. Bolotova A.K., Zhukov Ju.M. Psihologija kommunikacij [Communication psychology]. Moscow, Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2015, 496 p. (in Russ.).
4. Gavrilova T.P. [The concept of empathy in foreign psychology]. Voprosy psihologii [Psychology Issues], 1975, no. 2, pp. 147–158. (in Russ.).
5. Gorelova G.G., Manuilov G.V., Soldatova E.L. Lichnost v socialnom upravlenii [Personality in Social Management]. Chelyabinsk, Publishing Center of South Ural State University, 2018, 180 p. (in Russ.).
6. Zeer Je.F. Psihologija professij [Occupational Psychology]. Moscow, Academic project; Ekaterinburg, Business book, 2003, 344 p. (in Russ.).
7. Karpov A.V. Skityaeva I.M. Psihologija refleksii [Psychology of reflection]. Yaroslavl, Obverse Press, 2004, 203 p. (in Russ.).
8. Kozlov V.V., Ilchuk S.G. [The role of reflection and subjectivity in the integrative processes of personality]. Vestnik JarGU. Serija Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of Yaroslavl State University. Humanities Series], 2014, no. 1 (27), pp. 80–85. (in Russ.).
9. Leontev D.A., Osin E.N. [Reflection “good” and “bad”: from an explanatory model to differential diagnosis]. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2014, no. 11 (4), pp. 110–135. (in Russ.).
10. Manuilov G.V. Ocenka urovnja jempatii i refleksii u studentov medicinskih vuzov i vrachej [Assessment of the level of empathy and reflection in students of medical universities and doctors]. Nauchnyj poisk: materialy desjatoj nauchnoj konferencii aspirantov i doktorantov [Scientific research: materials of the tenth scientific conference of graduate students and doctoral students]. Chelyabinsk, 2018. pp. 137–141. (in Russ.).
11. Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psihologicheskogo issledovanija: analiz i interpretacija dannyh: uchebnoe posobie [Mathematical methods of psychological research: analysis and interpretation of data: a training manual]. St. Petersburg, Rech. 2004, 392 p. (in Russ.).
12. Nejronnye seti. STATISTICA Neural Networks: Metodologija i tehnologii sovremennogo analiza dannyh [Neural networks. STATISTICA Neural Networks: Methodology and technology of modern data analysis] editor V.P. Borovikova. Moscow, Gorjachaja linija–Telekom, 2008. 392 p. (in Russ.).
13. Povarenkov Ju.P. Psihologicheskoe soderzhanie professionalnogo stanovlenija cheloveka [The
psychological content of the professional development of man]. Moscow, URAO, 2002, 160 p. (in Russ.).
14. Sidorenko E.V. Metody matematicheskoj obrabotki v psihologii [Methods of mathematical processing in psychology]. St. Petersburg, Rech, 2002, 350 p. (in Russ.).
15. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manujlov G.M. Socialno-psihologicheskaja diagnostika razvitija lichnosti i malyh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnosis of personality development and small groups]. Moscow, Publishing house of Institute of Psychotherapy, 2002, 490 p. (in Russ.).
16. Junkerov V.I., Grigorev S.G., Rezvancev M.V. Matematiko-statisticheskaja obrabotka dannyh medicinskih issledovanij [Mathematical and statistical processing of medical research data]. St. Petersburg, VMedA, 2011, 318 p. (in Russ.).
17. Jusupov I.M. Vchuvstvovanie, proniknovenie, ponimanie [Feeling, penetration, understanding]. Kazan, 1993, 199 p. (in Russ.).
18. Grant A.M. Rethinking psychological mindedness: metacognition, self-reflection, and insight. Behaviour Change, 2001, vol. 18, pp. 8–17.
19. Loring W.McA. A Practical Guide to CPI Interpretation. Consulting Psychologists Press, 1988. 105 p.
20. Rogers С. Empatic: an unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist, 1975, no. 5 (2), pp. 2–10.

References on translit

Published
2020-05-14
How to Cite
Manuilov, G., Gorelova, G., & Yashchenko, E. (2020). THE FEATURES OF EMPATHY AND REFLECTION IN A PERSON AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF EDUCATION. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 13(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps200101
Section
Methodological and theoretical issues of psychology

Most read articles by the same author(s)