Brain activity patterns during reading texts of various registers in students with different language systems

Keywords: psychophysiological features, EEG, evoked potentials, text reading, language signspsychophysiological features, language signs

Abstract

Introduction: Investigating the psychophysiological characteristics of perceiving information in different registers within a foreign language environment can help identify factors that impede adaptation and integration into cultural and educational settings. Aims: the study aimed to identify specific psychophysiological patterns of brain activity during the reading of texts by respondents with different native language systems. Materials and methods: participants were students divided into groups: 1. native Russian speakers with English proficiency not lower than B1 level and no experience learning Chinese (n = 16); 2. native Chinese speakers with English proficiency not lower than B1 level and no experience learning Russian (n = 9). Evoked potentials were recorded during the perception of words, images, and texts. The stimulus material consisted of cards with high-frequency nouns in Russian, English, and Chinese with images representing these words; equivalent texts in Russian, English, and Chinese; and comprehension questions for these texts. Electroencephalograms and evoked potentials were recorded simultaneously with a focus on three key parameters: latency, amplitude, and topography. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test and linear regression analysis. Results: reading texts of different registers was accompanied by changes in perception, decoding, and comprehension. These changes are driven by altered activity in the brain structures that support written language comprehension. Russian-speaking students adapted more effectively to foreign texts, whereas Chinese-speaking students exhibited greater cognitive performance when processing figurative texts. This difference reflects the influence of cultural and linguistic characteristics on information processing. Conclusion. These findings confirm the existence of language- and text-specific features of information processing at the psychophysiological level. The obtained data can be used for further research in neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psycholinguistics, and intercultural communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

R. A. Doronin , 1) South Ural State University (76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia); 2) Regional Clinical Hospital No. 3 (287 Pobedy Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454021, Russia)

1) Psychologist, Department of Clinical Psychology; 2) psychologist of the Department of Medical Rehabilitation

A. V. Astayeva , South Ural State University (76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia)

Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Psychology

N. V. Epaneshnikova , South Ural State University (76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia)

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Clinical Psychology

G. V. Manuilov , South Ural State University (76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia)

Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology of Management and Performance

References

1. Petrova N.E. Functional stylistic features Russian and Chinese languages. Baltiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal = Baltic Humanitarian Journal. 2019;8(3):327–330. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.26140/bgz3-2019-0803-0082
2. Fernandez C.B., Fitcofsky K.A., van Hell J.G. Neural correlates of intra-sentential code-switching in the auditory modality. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 2019;51:17–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.10.004
3. Shen L., Li X., Huang S. et al. Comprehending scientific metaphors in the bilingual brain: Evidence from event-related potentials. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037525
4. Wang Q. Neural Mechanism and Representation of English and Chinese Metaphors of Bilinguals with Different Second Language Proficiency: An ERP Study. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2018;41(1):67–83. DOI: 10.1515/cjal-2018-0004
5. Deckert M., Schmoeger M., Geist M. et al. Electrophysiological correlates of conventional metaphor, irony, and literal language processing – An event-related potentials and eLORETA study. Brain and Language. 2021;215:104930. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104930.
6. Huang Y., Jiang M., Wang Y., Yao D. When one pseudoword elicits larger P600 than another: a study on the role of reprocessing in anomalous sentence comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2021;36(10):1201–1214. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1922724
7. Sun L., Chen H., Zhang C. et al. Decoding brain activities of literary metaphor comprehension: An event-related potential and EEG spectral analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:913521. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913521
8. Sinkin M.V., Kvaskova N.E., Broutian A.G. et al. Russian Glossary of Terms Used in Clinical Electroencephalography. Nervnye bolezni = Nervous diseases. 2021;1:83–88. DOI: 10.24412/2226-0757-2021-12312.
9. Menashe S., Mashal N., Anaki D. N400 modulations in metaphor evaluation and its associ-ations with attentional systems: A behavioral and ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 2024;72:101203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2024.101203.
10. Zhu G., Huang Y., Wang X. Basic Theory of EEG. Multi-Modal EEG Monitoring of Severely Neurological Ill Patients. 2021:4–26. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-4493-1_1
11. Bambini V., Bertini C., Schaeken W. et al. Disentangling Metaphor from Context: An ERP Study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7:559. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00559
12. Xu X., Zhang J., Wang Y., Jiang M. An ERP study on the late stage of Chinese metaphor processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2024;18:1269153. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1269153
13. Jończyk R., Kremer G.E., Siddique Z., van Hell J.G. Engineering creativity: Prior experience modulates electrophysiological responses to novel metaphors. Psychophysiology. 2020;57(10):e13630. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13630
14. McGregor S., Agres K., Rataj K. et al. Re-Representing Metaphor: Modeling Metaphor Perception Using Dynamically Contextual Distributional Semantics. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:765. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00765
15. Tang X., Shen L., Yang P. et al. Bilingual Processing Mechanisms of Scientific Metaphors and Conventional Metaphors: Evidence via a Contrastive Event-Related Potentials Study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:894114. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894114
16. Koller S., Müller N., Kauschke C. The Elephant in the Room: A Systematic Review of Stimulus Control in Neuro-Measurement Studies on Figurative Language Processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2022;15:791374. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.791374
17. Neves E.P., Cravo A.M., Carthery-Goulart M.T. Functionality of the N400 component and its application in studies of figurative language processing: a systematic review. Revista Linguagem em Foco. 2021;13(4):204–229. DOI: 10.46230/2674-8266-13-7263
18. Guidelines for carrying out of routine EEG of neurophysiology expert board of Russian league against epilepsy. Epilepsiya i paroksizmalnye sostoyaniya = Epilepsy and paroxysmal conditions. 2016;8(4):99–108. (in Russ.)
19. Belkhiria C., Peysakhovich V. Electro-Encephalography and Electro-Oculography in Aeronautics: A Review Over the Last Decade (2010-2020). Frontiers in Neuroergonomics. 2020;1:606719. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2020.606719

References on translit

-
Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Doronin, R., Astayeva, A., Epaneshnikova, N., & Manuilov, G. (2025). Brain activity patterns during reading texts of various registers in students with different language systems. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 18(3), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps250308
Section
Psychophysiology